Menstrual cycle on internal and external load in amateur women CrossFit players

Background: Female physical performance can be influenced by perceived, physiological, and physical factors, making it an important field for further research. Aims: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of the menstrual cycle (MC) on the cardiovascular and neuromuscular load of amateur women athletes in CrossFit® during real training situations. Methods: Resistance-trained CrossFit® athletes (without oral contraception) and eumenorrheic women participated in this study (age: 29.6 ± 4.06 years; height: 1.59.3 ± 0.06 m; body mass: 61.22 ± 4.59 kg). A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted to evaluate heart rate variability (rMSSD), upper-body strength, muscular endurance, and power performance. The data were analyzed using a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA and the nonparametric Friedman test to assess significant differences among the follicular, ovulatory, and luteal phases for all assessments. The significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Result: Results revealed no significant differences between the menstrual cycle phases in performance: (HRV RMSSD: H: 0.830, p: 0.443, η2: 0.038), (Push up test: H: 0.041, p: 0.959, η2: 0.002), (countermovement jump: H: 11.921, p: 0.050, η2: 0.362), (rate force development CMJ: H: 1.242, p: 0.299, η2: 0.056), (squat jump: H: 0.439, p: 0.648, η2: 0.020), (rate force development SJ: H: 1.703, p: 0.194, η2: 0.075), (isometric mid-thigh pull: H: 0.019, p: 0.981, η2: 9.132x10-4). Performance is not altered during the MC in female CrossFit® trained athletes. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that the menstrual cycle does not significantly influence internal and external training load, heart rate variability, or strength and power performance in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v5i1.990
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Menstrual cycle on internal and external load in amateur women CrossFit players

Jose David Peralta, Diego Calderon, German Jimenez, Cristian Yanez et al.
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Exercise and Physiological Responses
article

Menstrual cycle on internal and external load in amateur women CrossFit players

Jose David Peralta, Diego Calderon, German Jimenez, Cristian Yanez, Oscar Henriquez, Julio Angulo, Nestor Ochoa, Liliana Vergara
article en

Abstract

Background: Female physical performance can be influenced by perceived, physiological, and physical factors, making it an important field for further research. Aims: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of the menstrual cycle (MC) on the cardiovascular and neuromuscular load of amateur women athletes in CrossFit® during real training situations. Methods: Resistance-trained CrossFit® athletes (without oral contraception) and eumenorrheic women participated in this study (age: 29.6 ± 4.06 years; height: 1.59.3 ± 0.06 m; body mass: 61.22 ± 4.59 kg). A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted to evaluate heart rate variability (rMSSD), upper-body strength, muscular endurance, and power performance. The data were analyzed using a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA and the nonparametric Friedman test to assess significant differences among the follicular, ovulatory, and luteal phases for all assessments. The significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Result: Results revealed no significant differences between the menstrual cycle phases in performance: (HRV RMSSD: H: 0.830, p: 0.443, η2: 0.038), (Push up test: H: 0.041, p: 0.959, η2: 0.002), (countermovement jump: H: 11.921, p: 0.050, η2: 0.362), (rate force development CMJ: H: 1.242, p: 0.299, η2: 0.056), (squat jump: H: 0.439, p: 0.648, η2: 0.020), (rate force development SJ: H: 1.703, p: 0.194, η2: 0.075), (isometric mid-thigh pull: H: 0.019, p: 0.981, η2: 9.132x10-4). Performance is not altered during the MC in female CrossFit® trained athletes. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that the menstrual cycle does not significantly influence internal and external training load, heart rate variability, or strength and power performance in this population.

Journal of Coaching and Sports ScienceVol. 5(1)
University of Magdalena (CO), University of Applied and Environmental Sciences (CO), Alpha Technologies (Canada) (CA), Electronic Concepts and Engineering (United States) (US), University of the Coast (CO), GameDesk (US), Health Awareness (United States) (US), Embedded Fitness (Netherlands) (NL)
Gender equality, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.