A co‐produced analysis of SEND policy for children and young people: Centring racial and ethnic equity, mental health and accountability

Abstract Despite decades of documented ethnic inequalities in Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND), the well‐established role of social determinants of health and growing awareness of cultural safety and trauma‐informed practices in supporting children's mental health, their integration into England's SEND policy remains unclear. This study, co‐produced with peer researchers and community stakeholders, examined national and local SEND policy and guidelines in England across three domains: justice and equity; content related to mental health, cultural safety and trauma‐informed practice; and effective implementation. Systematic searches of national documents ( n = 129) and Local Authority websites ( n = 152) identified eligible content analysed using a co‐developed coding framework. We calculated the frequency of content meeting baseline criteria and examined patterns and implications. Findings revealed current policy does not align with aspects of equitable and effective policy. Inequalities are superficially acknowledged with little recognition of social determinants of health. Although SEND provision, particularly for mental health, sits at the crossroads of education and health/healthcare rights, this connection is rarely addressed and requirements for children's participation are inconsistently exemplified. The SEND system lacks clarity in supporting mental health, cultural safety approaches are absent, and clear direction on trauma‐informed practices is missing. Accountability mechanisms are insufficient with poorly defined roles, lack of transparency in complaints processes, inadequate monitoring of inequalities and missing enforcement mechanisms. There is an urgent need to establish a unified rights‐based vision with tangible accountability measures and explicit equity‐orientation to achieve an inclusive and equitable system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70078
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A co‐produced analysis of SEND policy for children and young people: Centring racial and ethnic equity, mental health and accountability

Sorcha Ní Chobhthaigh, Ariel Lindorff, Mel Green, Delan Devakumar et al.
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

A co‐produced analysis of SEND policy for children and young people: Centring racial and ethnic equity, mental health and accountability

Sorcha Ní Chobhthaigh, Ariel Lindorff, Mel Green, Delan Devakumar, Diana Ceccolini, Josephine Musanu, Cyra Neave, Mina Mawi, Amie Buhari, Rochelle A. Burgess, Camille Cox, Twyla Greenway‐Bailey, Matthew A. Jay
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite decades of documented ethnic inequalities in Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND), the well‐established role of social determinants of health and growing awareness of cultural safety and trauma‐informed practices in supporting children's mental health, their integration into England's SEND policy remains unclear. This study, co‐produced with peer researchers and community stakeholders, examined national and local SEND policy and guidelines in England across three domains: justice and equity; content related to mental health, cultural safety and trauma‐informed practice; and effective implementation. Systematic searches of national documents ( n = 129) and Local Authority websites ( n = 152) identified eligible content analysed using a co‐developed coding framework. We calculated the frequency of content meeting baseline criteria and examined patterns and implications. Findings revealed current policy does not align with aspects of equitable and effective policy. Inequalities are superficially acknowledged with little recognition of social determinants of health. Although SEND provision, particularly for mental health, sits at the crossroads of education and health/healthcare rights, this connection is rarely addressed and requirements for children's participation are inconsistently exemplified. The SEND system lacks clarity in supporting mental health, cultural safety approaches are absent, and clear direction on trauma‐informed practices is missing. Accountability mechanisms are insufficient with poorly defined roles, lack of transparency in complaints processes, inadequate monitoring of inequalities and missing enforcement mechanisms. There is an urgent need to establish a unified rights‐based vision with tangible accountability measures and explicit equity‐orientation to achieve an inclusive and equitable system.

Journal of Research in Special Educational NeedsVol. 26(2)
New Economics Foundation (GB), The Open University (GB), Anna Freud Centre (GB), University of Oxford (GB), London Borough of Islington (GB), London Borough of Camden (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.