FROM MONOLITHIC APPS TO LIVING SYSTEMS: SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MODELS FOR PERSISTENT AI-AGENT ECOSYSTEMS

Abstract For decades, software development has been dominated by application-centric paradigms in which systems are designed as bounded artifacts with clearly defined lifecycles. Even as architectures evolved from monolithic applications to distributed and service-oriented systems, the fundamental assumption remained unchanged: software is deployed, executed, and eventually replaced, rather than continuously existing as an adaptive entity. The recent emergence of persistent AI agents challenges this assumption by introducing software components that maintain identity, memory, and behavior across extended periods of operation. This paper proposes a shift from traditional application models toward living software systems, defined as persistent ecosystems of AI agents that continuously interact, evolve, and coordinate within a shared software environment. Unlike stateless services or short-lived processes, persistent AI agents retain contextual knowledge over time, enabling systems to exhibit long-term behavior, adaptation, and emergent dynamics. This transformation has profound implications for software development models, which must move beyond code-centric abstractions toward behavior-centric design and lifecycle-aware architectures. The study examines how persistent AI-agent ecosystems differ fundamentally from monolithic and conventional distributed systems, both conceptually and architecturally. It introduces a software development perspective that treats persistence, coordination, and behavioral evolution as first-class concerns. Rather than focusing on individual algorithms or agent implementations, the paper analyzes how development models, architectural structures, and lifecycle practices must change to support living systems at scale. The contributions of this work are threefold. First, it provides a clear conceptual distinction between traditional software systems and living systems composed of persistent AI agents. Second, it outlines software development models that enable the design, implementation, and evolution of such systems. Third, it discusses the broader implications of persistent AI-agent ecosystems for software architecture, orchestration, and long-term system governance. By reframing software as a continuously evolving ecosystem rather than a static product, this paper offers a new foundation for AI-native software development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18885496
Primary Topic
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FROM MONOLITHIC APPS TO LIVING SYSTEMS: SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MODELS FOR PERSISTENT AI-AGENT ECOSYSTEMS

Umut Gumeli
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
article

FROM MONOLITHIC APPS TO LIVING SYSTEMS: SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MODELS FOR PERSISTENT AI-AGENT ECOSYSTEMS

Umut Gumeli
article en

Abstract

Abstract For decades, software development has been dominated by application-centric paradigms in which systems are designed as bounded artifacts with clearly defined lifecycles. Even as architectures evolved from monolithic applications to distributed and service-oriented systems, the fundamental assumption remained unchanged: software is deployed, executed, and eventually replaced, rather than continuously existing as an adaptive entity. The recent emergence of persistent AI agents challenges this assumption by introducing software components that maintain identity, memory, and behavior across extended periods of operation. This paper proposes a shift from traditional application models toward living software systems, defined as persistent ecosystems of AI agents that continuously interact, evolve, and coordinate within a shared software environment. Unlike stateless services or short-lived processes, persistent AI agents retain contextual knowledge over time, enabling systems to exhibit long-term behavior, adaptation, and emergent dynamics. This transformation has profound implications for software development models, which must move beyond code-centric abstractions toward behavior-centric design and lifecycle-aware architectures. The study examines how persistent AI-agent ecosystems differ fundamentally from monolithic and conventional distributed systems, both conceptually and architecturally. It introduces a software development perspective that treats persistence, coordination, and behavioral evolution as first-class concerns. Rather than focusing on individual algorithms or agent implementations, the paper analyzes how development models, architectural structures, and lifecycle practices must change to support living systems at scale. The contributions of this work are threefold. First, it provides a clear conceptual distinction between traditional software systems and living systems composed of persistent AI agents. Second, it outlines software development models that enable the design, implementation, and evolution of such systems. Third, it discusses the broader implications of persistent AI-agent ecosystems for software architecture, orchestration, and long-term system governance. By reframing software as a continuously evolving ecosystem rather than a static product, this paper offers a new foundation for AI-native software development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sunesis (United States) (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.