ChatGPT as a feedback tool for read-aloud questions: Preservice teachers’ experience and perceptions

This study explored how preservice teachers evaluated peer and ChatGPT-generated feedback for Question-Answer Relationship questions written for a picture book read-aloud. Grounded in Vygotskian theory and reciprocal teaching, the learning event was scaffolded so PSTs wrote questions, engaged in dialogic feedback with a peer, and were then guided to prompt ChatGPT for feedback for their questions. Results indicated that while PSTs valued social interaction and collaboration with peers, they appreciated the potential advantages of using AI to complement feedback because it was faster, descriptive and depersonalized. Researchers highlight the importance of approaching GenAI as a dialogic partner—one that requires thoughtful prompting, ongoing refinement, and critical engagement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13016/m2ei9f-pbor
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT as a feedback tool for read-aloud questions: Preservice teachers’ experience and perceptions

Carin Appleget, Shuling Yang
Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

ChatGPT as a feedback tool for read-aloud questions: Preservice teachers’ experience and perceptions

Carin Appleget, Shuling Yang
article en

Abstract

This study explored how preservice teachers evaluated peer and ChatGPT-generated feedback for Question-Answer Relationship questions written for a picture book read-aloud. Grounded in Vygotskian theory and reciprocal teaching, the learning event was scaffolded so PSTs wrote questions, engaged in dialogic feedback with a peer, and were then guided to prompt ChatGPT for feedback for their questions. Results indicated that while PSTs valued social interaction and collaboration with peers, they appreciated the potential advantages of using AI to complement feedback because it was faster, descriptive and depersonalized. Researchers highlight the importance of approaching GenAI as a dialogic partner—one that requires thoughtful prompting, ongoing refinement, and critical engagement.

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.