Estimating the Effect of Pravastatin versus Usual Care Under Full Adherence in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial—Lipid Lowering Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)

The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack-Lipid-Lowering Trial (ALLHAT-LLT) was a pragmatic randomized trial conducted in 513 clinical centers across North America from 1994 to 2002. ALLHAT-LLT, which used standard of care (usual care) as the control treatment, did not find an effect of assignment to pravastatin on all-cause death. We aimed to use the trial data to estimate the effect of adhering to assigned treatment, that is, the per-protocol effect. Moderately hypercholesterolemic (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 100-189 mg/dL), hypertensive participants ≥55 years old were included and randomized to pravastatin (40 mg/day unless contraindicated) or usual care (lipid-lowering treatment discouraged unless clinically indicated). Of 10 355 individuals randomized, we included 9741 with complete baseline data. One-third of individuals in the pravastatin arm were nonadherent to the assigned treatment strategy at year 5. After adjusting for factors related to adherence, the 5-year risk difference comparing pravastatin to usual care was -3.0% (-4.9%, -1.3%) and the risk ratio was 0.79 (0.68, 0.91) for death. Findings were consistent across different definitions of treatment strategies. Our results suggest that the use of pravastatin under full adherence was protective against death, while assignment to pravastatin was not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag049
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Effect of Pravastatin versus Usual Care Under Full Adherence in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial—Lipid Lowering Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)

E B Rimm, Issa J Dahabreh, Rienna Russo, M A Hernan et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Estimating the Effect of Pravastatin versus Usual Care Under Full Adherence in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial—Lipid Lowering Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)

E B Rimm, Issa J Dahabreh, Rienna Russo, M A Hernan, G Danaei, Anna Siefkas, Barry R Davis
article en

Abstract

The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack-Lipid-Lowering Trial (ALLHAT-LLT) was a pragmatic randomized trial conducted in 513 clinical centers across North America from 1994 to 2002. ALLHAT-LLT, which used standard of care (usual care) as the control treatment, did not find an effect of assignment to pravastatin on all-cause death. We aimed to use the trial data to estimate the effect of adhering to assigned treatment, that is, the per-protocol effect. Moderately hypercholesterolemic (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 100-189 mg/dL), hypertensive participants ≥55 years old were included and randomized to pravastatin (40 mg/day unless contraindicated) or usual care (lipid-lowering treatment discouraged unless clinically indicated). Of 10 355 individuals randomized, we included 9741 with complete baseline data. One-third of individuals in the pravastatin arm were nonadherent to the assigned treatment strategy at year 5. After adjusting for factors related to adherence, the 5-year risk difference comparing pravastatin to usual care was -3.0% (-4.9%, -1.3%) and the risk ratio was 0.79 (0.68, 0.91) for death. Findings were consistent across different definitions of treatment strategies. Our results suggest that the use of pravastatin under full adherence was protective against death, while assignment to pravastatin was not.

American Journal of Epidemiology
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US), Harvard University (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Deaconess Hospital (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.