Resolving upper mantle anisotropy in 3-D: A case study in the Upper Rhine Graben area, Central Europe

Abstract The analysis of long-term data (15-25 yr) regarding shear wave splitting (SWS) of SKS, SKKS, PKS (XKS) phases at six (semi-)permanent broadband seismological recording stations (BFO, WLS, STU, ECH, TMO44, TMO07) indicates vertical and small-lateral variations of the seismic anisotropy underneath the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) area.In this study, the two splitting parameters, the fast polarization direction Φ and the delay time δt, are measured, and show characteristic backazimuthal variations. Additionally, the splitting intensity is calculated. SKS-SKKS phase pairs show no significant discrepancies and therefore do not indicate a significant contribution from the lowermost mantle. Thus, the observed anisotropy is assumed to be located in the upper mantle (lithosphere and asthenosphere). To explain the SWS measurements, structural anisotropy models with one layer with a horizontal (simple anisotropy) as well as a tilted symmetry axis and two layers with horizontal symmetry axes (complex anisotropy) are tested in a modeling procedure based on forward-calculated synthetic splitting parameters. Besides fitting the whole backazimuth (BAZ) range, the modeling is limited to station-specific BAZ ranges. The consideration of differences and similarities in the splitting pattern across the recording stations allows to outline subregions with different anisotropy regimes and by this to propose a structural 3-D model of the anisotropy in the upper mantle underneath the URG: Differences are found between the east and the west sides of the URG (change of the fast polarization directions) and between the Moldanubian Zone in the south and the Saxothuringian Zone in the north (change from two layers to one layer). Inconsistent splitting parameters and the observation of numerous nulls (no SWS), especially underneath the southern URG in the southwest of BFO, may be at least partly related to scattering of the seismic wavefield or a modification of the mantle material. Additional materials Talk mentioned in the section "Modeling: strucutral models": https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18524089 Related peer-reviewed journal articles Fröhlich Y, Grund M, Ritter J R R (2024). Lateral and vertical variations of seismic anisotropy in the lithosphere-asthenosphere system underneath Central Europe from long-term splitting measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 239(1):112-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae245. Ritter J R R, Fröhlich Y, Sanz Alonso Y, Grund M (2022). Short-scale laterally varying SK(K)S shear wave splitting at BFO, Germany – implications for the determination of anisotropic structures. Journal of Seismology, 26:1137-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10112-w, correction https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-023-10136-w.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18524083
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving upper mantle anisotropy in 3-D: A case study in the Upper Rhine Graben area, Central Europe

Yvonne Fröhlich
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
High-pressure geophysics and materials
article

Resolving upper mantle anisotropy in 3-D: A case study in the Upper Rhine Graben area, Central Europe

Yvonne Fröhlich
article en

Abstract

Abstract The analysis of long-term data (15-25 yr) regarding shear wave splitting (SWS) of SKS, SKKS, PKS (XKS) phases at six (semi-)permanent broadband seismological recording stations (BFO, WLS, STU, ECH, TMO44, TMO07) indicates vertical and small-lateral variations of the seismic anisotropy underneath the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) area.In this study, the two splitting parameters, the fast polarization direction Φ and the delay time δt, are measured, and show characteristic backazimuthal variations. Additionally, the splitting intensity is calculated. SKS-SKKS phase pairs show no significant discrepancies and therefore do not indicate a significant contribution from the lowermost mantle. Thus, the observed anisotropy is assumed to be located in the upper mantle (lithosphere and asthenosphere). To explain the SWS measurements, structural anisotropy models with one layer with a horizontal (simple anisotropy) as well as a tilted symmetry axis and two layers with horizontal symmetry axes (complex anisotropy) are tested in a modeling procedure based on forward-calculated synthetic splitting parameters. Besides fitting the whole backazimuth (BAZ) range, the modeling is limited to station-specific BAZ ranges. The consideration of differences and similarities in the splitting pattern across the recording stations allows to outline subregions with different anisotropy regimes and by this to propose a structural 3-D model of the anisotropy in the upper mantle underneath the URG: Differences are found between the east and the west sides of the URG (change of the fast polarization directions) and between the Moldanubian Zone in the south and the Saxothuringian Zone in the north (change from two layers to one layer). Inconsistent splitting parameters and the observation of numerous nulls (no SWS), especially underneath the southern URG in the southwest of BFO, may be at least partly related to scattering of the seismic wavefield or a modification of the mantle material. Additional materials Talk mentioned in the section "Modeling: strucutral models": https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18524089 Related peer-reviewed journal articles Fröhlich Y, Grund M, Ritter J R R (2024). Lateral and vertical variations of seismic anisotropy in the lithosphere-asthenosphere system underneath Central Europe from long-term splitting measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 239(1):112-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae245. Ritter J R R, Fröhlich Y, Sanz Alonso Y, Grund M (2022). Short-scale laterally varying SK(K)S shear wave splitting at BFO, Germany – implications for the determination of anisotropic structures. Journal of Seismology, 26:1137-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10112-w, correction https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-023-10136-w.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.