Impacts of cascading check dams on sediment yield in the Middle Yellow River Basin: insights from 50 years of grid-cell-level simulation

Abstract. Check dams, globally built for controlling soil erosion, form complex cascading systems that pose significant challenges for assessing spatiotemporal dynamics of sediment yield (SY) at large basin scale. This study proposed an integrative framework combining dynamic sediment trapping efficiency of cascading check dams with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), index of connectivity (IC), and sediment delivery ratio (SDR). This model was applied to evaluate grid-cell-based distribution of SY and sediment trapped by check dams during 1970–2020 in the middle Yellow River Basin (with over 47000 check dams). The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of proposed model increased to 0.71 compared to model ignoring sediment trapping of check dams (0.59). Check dams reduced the multi-year average SY by 50.01 % in dam-controlled areas. Totally 3.84 × 109 t of sediment was trapped over the 50 years, constituting 41.49 % of designed storage capacity. The sediment reduction contribution by check dams (SRCdam) exhibited considerable spatial heterogeneity, ranging from 73.9 % to 0.9 % among sub-basins, and the proportion of accumulated sediment to storage capacity of check dams (SARdam) varied from 78.1 % to 1.1 %. The SRCdam increased linearly with check dam density and the share of area they controlled, whereas SARdam increased logarithmically with SY from upstream of the check dams (P < 0.001). A trade-off between SRCdam and SARdam in some sub-basins indicates that the number of check dams in these basins is insufficient or overmuch. This study provides a practical and data-efficient method for assessing sediment trapping and reduction by cascading check dam systems in large basins, offering valuable insights for improving soil and water conservation strategies in erosion-prone regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5473-2026
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of cascading check dams on sediment yield in the Middle Yellow River Basin: insights from 50 years of grid-cell-level simulation

Lishan Ran, Yanzhang Huang, Guangyao Gao, Mingguo Zheng et al.
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Impacts of cascading check dams on sediment yield in the Middle Yellow River Basin: insights from 50 years of grid-cell-level simulation

Lishan Ran, Yanzhang Huang, Guangyao Gao, Mingguo Zheng, Yue Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Check dams, globally built for controlling soil erosion, form complex cascading systems that pose significant challenges for assessing spatiotemporal dynamics of sediment yield (SY) at large basin scale. This study proposed an integrative framework combining dynamic sediment trapping efficiency of cascading check dams with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), index of connectivity (IC), and sediment delivery ratio (SDR). This model was applied to evaluate grid-cell-based distribution of SY and sediment trapped by check dams during 1970–2020 in the middle Yellow River Basin (with over 47000 check dams). The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of proposed model increased to 0.71 compared to model ignoring sediment trapping of check dams (0.59). Check dams reduced the multi-year average SY by 50.01 % in dam-controlled areas. Totally 3.84 × 109 t of sediment was trapped over the 50 years, constituting 41.49 % of designed storage capacity. The sediment reduction contribution by check dams (SRCdam) exhibited considerable spatial heterogeneity, ranging from 73.9 % to 0.9 % among sub-basins, and the proportion of accumulated sediment to storage capacity of check dams (SARdam) varied from 78.1 % to 1.1 %. The SRCdam increased linearly with check dam density and the share of area they controlled, whereas SARdam increased logarithmically with SY from upstream of the check dams (P < 0.001). A trade-off between SRCdam and SARdam in some sub-basins indicates that the number of check dams in these basins is insufficient or overmuch. This study provides a practical and data-efficient method for assessing sediment trapping and reduction by cascading check dam systems in large basins, offering valuable insights for improving soil and water conservation strategies in erosion-prone regions.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 30(17)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN), Forest Research (GB), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), Shaanxi Institute of Zoology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.