Framing Migration from the Border: A Relational Approach to Discursive Practices Around Migration in Trieste

This study examines how local actors in border zones engage with migration through collaborative, competitive, and conflicting discursive practices, viewing the border as both a physical and symbolic reference. It proposes the concept of a “relational field” to deepen the discussion on the discursive dimension of the “migration battleground” and to expand its conceptual scope. Focusing on Trieste, a key Italian border town at the end of the so-called Balkan route and a paradigmatic site in national debates on borders and identity, the research draws on extensive ethnographic fieldwork and document analysis. Using diagnostic and prognostic frameworks, it analyses the discursive practices of civil, social, and institutional actors, offering an in-depth portrait of the discourse on migration in Trieste. The study shows how relational processes position stakeholders across a complex discursive spectrum, challenging binary pro- and anti-migrant narratives and revealing unexpected points of convergence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Borderlands Studies
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2026.2633133
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing Migration from the Border: A Relational Approach to Discursive Practices Around Migration in Trieste

Chiara Milan, Francesca Fortarezza
Journal of Borderlands Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Framing Migration from the Border: A Relational Approach to Discursive Practices Around Migration in Trieste

Chiara Milan, Francesca Fortarezza
article en

Abstract

This study examines how local actors in border zones engage with migration through collaborative, competitive, and conflicting discursive practices, viewing the border as both a physical and symbolic reference. It proposes the concept of a “relational field” to deepen the discussion on the discursive dimension of the “migration battleground” and to expand its conceptual scope. Focusing on Trieste, a key Italian border town at the end of the so-called Balkan route and a paradigmatic site in national debates on borders and identity, the research draws on extensive ethnographic fieldwork and document analysis. Using diagnostic and prognostic frameworks, it analyses the discursive practices of civil, social, and institutional actors, offering an in-depth portrait of the discourse on migration in Trieste. The study shows how relational processes position stakeholders across a complex discursive spectrum, challenging binary pro- and anti-migrant narratives and revealing unexpected points of convergence.

Journal of Borderlands Studies
Scuola Normale Superiore (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.