A reformulação das nomeações judiciais: o estado de direito como restrição à manipulação política

This chapter addresses the political abuse of judicial appointment procedures as a mechanism through which judicial independence may be undermined. It begins by reviewing the literature on appointment-related irregularities, drawing on both doctrinal analyses and comparative studies, while also noting conceptual limitations that leave important aspects of contemporary practices insufficiently explained. Against this backdrop, the chapter situates its inquiry within the existing theoretical debates on the rule of law and judicial independence, and seeks to enrich these normative concepts by examining how institutional safeguards can be eroded through formally legal but politically motivated interventions. By employing the rule of law as an interpretive lens—highlighting its role in constraining arbitrariness and grounding the exercise of public authority in justification— the chapter offers an additional analytical perspective for evaluating the legitimacy of judicial appointment reforms, complementing both the existing scholarship and the emerging case law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Published
2025-11-06
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A reformulação das nomeações judiciais: o estado de direito como restrição à manipulação política

Teodora Miljojković
Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

A reformulação das nomeações judiciais: o estado de direito como restrição à manipulação política

Teodora Miljojković
article en

Abstract

This chapter addresses the political abuse of judicial appointment procedures as a mechanism through which judicial independence may be undermined. It begins by reviewing the literature on appointment-related irregularities, drawing on both doctrinal analyses and comparative studies, while also noting conceptual limitations that leave important aspects of contemporary practices insufficiently explained. Against this backdrop, the chapter situates its inquiry within the existing theoretical debates on the rule of law and judicial independence, and seeks to enrich these normative concepts by examining how institutional safeguards can be eroded through formally legal but politically motivated interventions. By employing the rule of law as an interpretive lens—highlighting its role in constraining arbitrariness and grounding the exercise of public authority in justification— the chapter offers an additional analytical perspective for evaluating the legitimacy of judicial appointment reforms, complementing both the existing scholarship and the emerging case law.

Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A reformulação das nomeações judiciais: o estado de direito como restrição à manipulação política — Teodora Miljojković · Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS