Temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes during a health system shock

Background: To better understand reported COVID-19 pandemic effects on pregnancy, we examined temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes in a diverse population from South London, United Kingdom.<br/><br/>Methods: We included 31,411 singleton pregnancies with complete registration and birth outcomes across pre-pandemic (May 1/2019–March 22/2020, 24.5%), pandemic lockdowns (March 23/2020–July 17/2021, 32.3%), and pandemic without lockdown epochs (July 18/2021–April 22/2023, 43.2%). Multivariable regression was employed to evaluate outcomes by study epoch, adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., ethnicity, deprivation, site), followed by generalized additive modelling to visualise monthly trends.<br/><br/>Results: Here we show that of 17 outcomes: six have stable trends (e.g., preterm birth, stillbirth); eight show linear trends, either decreasing (e.g., gestational age at birth, vaginal tears) or increasing (e.g., Caesareans, postpartum haemorrhage); and three show quadratic (complex) trends (e.g., secondary mental health services, labour induction).<br/><br/>Conclusions: Overall, most outcomes during the pandemic mirror pre-pandemic trends, with fluctuations observed likely due to site-specific responses. Our findings highlight the need for temporal analysis of pregnancy outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-02-23
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes during a health system shock

Daghni Rajasingam, Alice McGreevy, Lisa English Long, Kathryn; id_orcid 0000-0003-0958-6725 Dalrymple et al.
Research Portal (King's College London)
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
article

Temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes during a health system shock

Daghni Rajasingam, Alice McGreevy, Lisa English Long, Kathryn; id_orcid 0000-0003-0958-6725 Dalrymple, Sergio A.; id_orcid 0000-0001-7177-3471 Silverio, Peter; id_orcid 0000-0003-4136-3070 von Dadelszen, Tisha; id_orcid 0000-0002-7874-9519 Dasgupta, Sara; id_orcid 0000-0001-7979-0508 White, Hiten; id_orcid 0000-0003-2564-7348 Mistry, Abigail; id_orcid 0000-0002-4462-6537 Easter, Lucilla; id_orcid 0000-0003-1100-2821 Poston, Laura Magee, Florence; id_orcid 0000-0001-9717-5533 Tydeman, ? ?, Yanzhong; id_orcid 0000-0002-0768-1676 Wang, Asma Khalil, Marina Soley Bori
article en

Abstract

Background: To better understand reported COVID-19 pandemic effects on pregnancy, we examined temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes in a diverse population from South London, United Kingdom.<br/><br/>Methods: We included 31,411 singleton pregnancies with complete registration and birth outcomes across pre-pandemic (May 1/2019–March 22/2020, 24.5%), pandemic lockdowns (March 23/2020–July 17/2021, 32.3%), and pandemic without lockdown epochs (July 18/2021–April 22/2023, 43.2%). Multivariable regression was employed to evaluate outcomes by study epoch, adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., ethnicity, deprivation, site), followed by generalized additive modelling to visualise monthly trends.<br/><br/>Results: Here we show that of 17 outcomes: six have stable trends (e.g., preterm birth, stillbirth); eight show linear trends, either decreasing (e.g., gestational age at birth, vaginal tears) or increasing (e.g., Caesareans, postpartum haemorrhage); and three show quadratic (complex) trends (e.g., secondary mental health services, labour induction).<br/><br/>Conclusions: Overall, most outcomes during the pandemic mirror pre-pandemic trends, with fluctuations observed likely due to site-specific responses. Our findings highlight the need for temporal analysis of pregnancy outcomes.

Research Portal (King's College London)
University of Liverpool (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Women's & Children's Health Research Institute (AU), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Population and Public Health (CA), King's College Hospital (GB), Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.