Training Drivers on L2 Automated Systems: A Pilot Study for Developing Effective Training that Drivers Will Use

Partially automated systems, also known as Level 2 (L2) automated systems or advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), are becoming increasingly common in the U.S. vehicle fleet, and ubiquitous on new vehicles. The Highway Loss Data Institute estimates that more than 28% of registered vehicles in the United States in 2023 were equipped with automatic emergency braking technology and that more than 90% of model year 2023 new vehicle series included automatic emergency braking as a standard or optional feature. Considering the increasing proliferation of vehicles equipped with L2 partial driving automation, it is important to ensure that drivers sufficiently understand the systems to support safe and appropriate use. Evidence suggests that proper understanding of L2 automated system leads to safer interactions with the systems , and that formal instruction produces greater understanding than trial and error alone. Additionally, engaging adults in learning about a new technology may require distinct design considerations well as motivational frameworks. Given drivers’ clear affinity for trial and error and the importance of relevance in the motivation model, it seems plausible that drivers might be more likely to engage with formal training if it is offered inside the vehicle itself, so that they could access training at the place and time when they seek to learn/understand/use the vehicle systems. However, practically, it remains unknown whether drivers would engage in training to gain understanding of these new systems, even if it were readily available in the vehicle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2026-03-04
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training Drivers on L2 Automated Systems: A Pilot Study for Developing Effective Training that Drivers Will Use

Richard L. Greatbatch, Brian C. Tefft, William J. Horrey, Jon Hankey et al.
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Training Drivers on L2 Automated Systems: A Pilot Study for Developing Effective Training that Drivers Will Use

Richard L. Greatbatch, Brian C. Tefft, William J. Horrey, Jon Hankey, Taylor Y. Linkous, Shiela Klauer
article en

Abstract

Partially automated systems, also known as Level 2 (L2) automated systems or advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), are becoming increasingly common in the U.S. vehicle fleet, and ubiquitous on new vehicles. The Highway Loss Data Institute estimates that more than 28% of registered vehicles in the United States in 2023 were equipped with automatic emergency braking technology and that more than 90% of model year 2023 new vehicle series included automatic emergency braking as a standard or optional feature. Considering the increasing proliferation of vehicles equipped with L2 partial driving automation, it is important to ensure that drivers sufficiently understand the systems to support safe and appropriate use. Evidence suggests that proper understanding of L2 automated system leads to safer interactions with the systems , and that formal instruction produces greater understanding than trial and error alone. Additionally, engaging adults in learning about a new technology may require distinct design considerations well as motivational frameworks. Given drivers’ clear affinity for trial and error and the importance of relevance in the motivation model, it seems plausible that drivers might be more likely to engage with formal training if it is offered inside the vehicle itself, so that they could access training at the place and time when they seek to learn/understand/use the vehicle systems. However, practically, it remains unknown whether drivers would engage in training to gain understanding of these new systems, even if it were readily available in the vehicle.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
U.S. Department of Transportation, General Motors Corporation, Virginia Department of Transportation
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.