The effectiveness of prehabilitation on post-operative recovery from lumbar spinal stenosis surgery - a systematic review and intervention component analysis.

<p dir="ltr">Objective: To evaluate prehabilitation interventions evaluated in randomised controlled trials for people undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery and determine which individual intervention components are associated with successful interventions. <p dir="ltr">Data sources: English language papers from 2011 until December 2025 from PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Scopus and Web of Science. <p dir="ltr">Review methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to other non-active interventions for people undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Two authors independently screened, selected and performed quality assessments of the studies. Relevant study details were extracted, tabulated and synthesised using intervention component analysis. <p dir="ltr">Results: Nine papers describing five randomised control trials involving 466 participants and 28 outcomes measured pre- and/or post-surgery were found. Overall, the interventions consisted of 47 individual components. Fifteen of these components (including psychological/behavioural approaches, and cardiovascular, strength and trunk/core exercise) featured in successful interventions that resulted in greater improvement in 16 outcomes (including back pain, disability, walking and hospital stay) in prehabilitation compared to usual care participants. The results of further evaluation of individual outcomes at each time point was inconsistent and unreliable. <p dir="ltr">Conclusion: Only five small trials of low-to-moderate quality report common outcomes at similar timepoints. There is high uncertainty regarding the importance of individual intervention components in successful prehabilitation interventions for people undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. [PROSPERO registration number: CRD42025645253, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025645253]

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2026-03-04
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effectiveness of prehabilitation on post-operative recovery from lumbar spinal stenosis surgery - a systematic review and intervention component analysis.

Paul Hendrick, Lianne Wood, Sallie Lamb, Rebecca Hunter (22226847) et al.
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

The effectiveness of prehabilitation on post-operative recovery from lumbar spinal stenosis surgery - a systematic review and intervention component analysis.

Paul Hendrick, Lianne Wood, Sallie Lamb, Rebecca Hunter (22226847), Andrew Booth (38949), Opinder Sahota (12337760), Beth Phillips (8843138), Peter Heine (17207740)
article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">Objective: To evaluate prehabilitation interventions evaluated in randomised controlled trials for people undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery and determine which individual intervention components are associated with successful interventions. <p dir="ltr">Data sources: English language papers from 2011 until December 2025 from PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Scopus and Web of Science. <p dir="ltr">Review methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to other non-active interventions for people undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Two authors independently screened, selected and performed quality assessments of the studies. Relevant study details were extracted, tabulated and synthesised using intervention component analysis. <p dir="ltr">Results: Nine papers describing five randomised control trials involving 466 participants and 28 outcomes measured pre- and/or post-surgery were found. Overall, the interventions consisted of 47 individual components. Fifteen of these components (including psychological/behavioural approaches, and cardiovascular, strength and trunk/core exercise) featured in successful interventions that resulted in greater improvement in 16 outcomes (including back pain, disability, walking and hospital stay) in prehabilitation compared to usual care participants. The results of further evaluation of individual outcomes at each time point was inconsistent and unreliable. <p dir="ltr">Conclusion: Only five small trials of low-to-moderate quality report common outcomes at similar timepoints. There is high uncertainty regarding the importance of individual intervention components in successful prehabilitation interventions for people undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. [PROSPERO registration number: CRD42025645253, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025645253]

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.