Heidegger’s Phusis (φύσις) and Daoist Ziran (自然): A phenomenological comparison of ‘Things-Themselves’ in Inter-dependence

This article explores a key notion of classical Daoism, ziran 自然, through Martin Heidegger's interpretation of the Greek word phusis. I discuss whether a comparison between these terms allows us to understand ziran differently, and whether a “ziranist” reading sheds more light on how Heidegger understands phusis. I argue that Heidegger challenged the dominance of metaphysics as dualist representational thinking, and that his phenomenological challenge to the dominant Western categories of thought allows us a clearer understanding of ziran in Daoism. I argue that both terms have gone through a similar development in history, which unfortunately does not do those terms justice. While phusis and ziran are often understood as indicating things being “in themselves”, purely self-generated and perceived as separate entities, my reading provides a new way to understand phenomenology's core mission of returning to “the things themselves”, consisting in seeing things as fundamentally processual and relational.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)
Published
2025-10-25
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heidegger’s Phusis (φύσις) and Daoist Ziran (自然): A phenomenological comparison of ‘Things-Themselves’ in Inter-dependence

Steven Burik
Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Heidegger’s Phusis (φύσις) and Daoist Ziran (自然): A phenomenological comparison of ‘Things-Themselves’ in Inter-dependence

Steven Burik
article en

Abstract

This article explores a key notion of classical Daoism, ziran 自然, through Martin Heidegger's interpretation of the Greek word phusis. I discuss whether a comparison between these terms allows us to understand ziran differently, and whether a “ziranist” reading sheds more light on how Heidegger understands phusis. I argue that Heidegger challenged the dominance of metaphysics as dualist representational thinking, and that his phenomenological challenge to the dominant Western categories of thought allows us a clearer understanding of ziran in Daoism. I argue that both terms have gone through a similar development in history, which unfortunately does not do those terms justice. While phusis and ziran are often understood as indicating things being “in themselves”, purely self-generated and perceived as separate entities, my reading provides a new way to understand phenomenology's core mission of returning to “the things themselves”, consisting in seeing things as fundamentally processual and relational.

Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heidegger’s Phusis (φύσις) and Daoist Ziran (自然): A phenomenological comparison of ‘Things-Themselves’ in Inter-dependence — Steven Burik · Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS