From Turkey to Belarus: exploring the EU’s response to migration crises through the lens of functional spillover

Drawing on functional spillover, this contribution examines whether functional spillover as a framework can explain the 2015 European Union-Turkey Joint Action Plan, the 2016 EU-Turkey Statement, and the internal aspect of the Union’s response to the 2021 Belarus–EU border crisis. Furthermore, it considers how these agreements with Turkey, and the response to the instrumentalisation of migration contributed to further integration. To do so, it draws on novel data collected through interviews with EU and member state officials and from a wide range of primary and secondary sources. From the analysis of these sources, we find evidence of functional spillover in the different stages of the negotiations on the European Union-Turkey Joint Action Plan and the EU-Turkey Statement, and in the different aspects of the Union’s response to the instrumentalisation of migration. Second, the analysis shows that the European Commission and a small number of member states–rather than the European Council acting as a collective, shaped substantial elements of the Union’s response to the migratory pressures on the Schengen Area’s external borders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2026.2631128
Primary Topic
European Politics and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Turkey to Belarus: exploring the EU’s response to migration crises through the lens of functional spillover

David Moloney
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
European Politics and Security
article

From Turkey to Belarus: exploring the EU’s response to migration crises through the lens of functional spillover

David Moloney
article en

Abstract

Drawing on functional spillover, this contribution examines whether functional spillover as a framework can explain the 2015 European Union-Turkey Joint Action Plan, the 2016 EU-Turkey Statement, and the internal aspect of the Union’s response to the 2021 Belarus–EU border crisis. Furthermore, it considers how these agreements with Turkey, and the response to the instrumentalisation of migration contributed to further integration. To do so, it draws on novel data collected through interviews with EU and member state officials and from a wide range of primary and secondary sources. From the analysis of these sources, we find evidence of functional spillover in the different stages of the negotiations on the European Union-Turkey Joint Action Plan and the EU-Turkey Statement, and in the different aspects of the Union’s response to the instrumentalisation of migration. Second, the analysis shows that the European Commission and a small number of member states–rather than the European Council acting as a collective, shaped substantial elements of the Union’s response to the migratory pressures on the Schengen Area’s external borders.

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
European Politics and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.