Are all students getting maximum value from bioscience practicals? Exploring the benefits of inclusive competence-based design

Practical work is expensive, complicated to organise and often exclusionary. However, practicals are commonly considered a core component of research-based bioscience education. This is difficult to justify when the majority of bioscience students will not go into bioscience research. We therefore need to have a robust rationale for including practical work in bioscience curricula, and to maximise the value of all practicals for all students whether in the laboratory, field or computational space. In this opinion article, we propose a competence-based education model for bioscience practical work, seeing competence as the ability to integrate skills, knowledge, attitudes and connections between practical learning and the wider world. We argue that using a competence model allows us to focus on the true value of practical work, and therefore to design more inclusive and authentic learning experiences. We encourage bioscience educators to rigorously question the purpose of practicals in their programmes, and whether they can maximise their educational value through more deliberate competence-driven curriculum design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging Topics in Life Sciences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1042/etls20253032
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are all students getting maximum value from bioscience practicals? Exploring the benefits of inclusive competence-based design

Dominic C. Henri, Katharine E. Hubbard
Emerging Topics in Life Sciences
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

Are all students getting maximum value from bioscience practicals? Exploring the benefits of inclusive competence-based design

Dominic C. Henri, Katharine E. Hubbard
article en

Abstract

Practical work is expensive, complicated to organise and often exclusionary. However, practicals are commonly considered a core component of research-based bioscience education. This is difficult to justify when the majority of bioscience students will not go into bioscience research. We therefore need to have a robust rationale for including practical work in bioscience curricula, and to maximise the value of all practicals for all students whether in the laboratory, field or computational space. In this opinion article, we propose a competence-based education model for bioscience practical work, seeing competence as the ability to integrate skills, knowledge, attitudes and connections between practical learning and the wider world. We argue that using a competence model allows us to focus on the true value of practical work, and therefore to design more inclusive and authentic learning experiences. We encourage bioscience educators to rigorously question the purpose of practicals in their programmes, and whether they can maximise their educational value through more deliberate competence-driven curriculum design.

Emerging Topics in Life SciencesVol. 9(5)
University of Hull (GB), Buckinghamshire New University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.