Beyond the Law: The Struggle to Apply Ihl in Internal Armed Conflicts

The evolution of armed conflict in the twenty-first century has made it difficult to differentiate between international and internal warfare. This poses significant challenges to the application and enforcement of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This paper critically examines the struggle to implement IHL in non-international armed conflicts (NIACs), and accentuates on the Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria. The paper adopts a doctrinal analysis of legal instruments, case law, and institutional reports, to interrogate the extent to which this armed group meets the threshold of a NIAC under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II. Additionally, it has been supported by domestic laws such as the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013. It was shown that the actions of this armed group has amounted to several crimes which are recognized internationally such as war crimes, crimes against humanity and several breaches of International Humanitarian Law. The violations of human rights and humanitarian law by their actions, which impinges on the international humanitarian laws which is the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention and Additional Protocol II of the Geneva Convention. This has led to the recognition of this conflicts to describe as one of non-international character. The study further explores the legal, political, and institutional barriers that hinder effective compliance and enforcement of IHL norms by both state and non-state actors. The findings reveal that IHL’s practical application in Nigeria remains constrained by state sovereignty concerns, lack of accountability mechanisms, and the ideological intransigence of insurgent groups. The study argues that these challenges reflect a broader tension between law and reality in modern internal conflicts. It concludes by recommending legal reforms, enhanced IHL training for security forces, and greater humanitarian engagement with non-state actors to ensure better protection of civilians and adherence to humanitarian norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Society
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20260901.21
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Law: The Struggle to Apply Ihl in Internal Armed Conflicts

Josephine Obasohan, Olisemenogor Nkeonyenasoa
International Journal of Law and Society
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Beyond the Law: The Struggle to Apply Ihl in Internal Armed Conflicts

Josephine Obasohan, Olisemenogor Nkeonyenasoa
article en

Abstract

The evolution of armed conflict in the twenty-first century has made it difficult to differentiate between international and internal warfare. This poses significant challenges to the application and enforcement of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This paper critically examines the struggle to implement IHL in non-international armed conflicts (NIACs), and accentuates on the Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria. The paper adopts a doctrinal analysis of legal instruments, case law, and institutional reports, to interrogate the extent to which this armed group meets the threshold of a NIAC under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II. Additionally, it has been supported by domestic laws such as the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013. It was shown that the actions of this armed group has amounted to several crimes which are recognized internationally such as war crimes, crimes against humanity and several breaches of International Humanitarian Law. The violations of human rights and humanitarian law by their actions, which impinges on the international humanitarian laws which is the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention and Additional Protocol II of the Geneva Convention. This has led to the recognition of this conflicts to describe as one of non-international character. The study further explores the legal, political, and institutional barriers that hinder effective compliance and enforcement of IHL norms by both state and non-state actors. The findings reveal that IHL’s practical application in Nigeria remains constrained by state sovereignty concerns, lack of accountability mechanisms, and the ideological intransigence of insurgent groups. The study argues that these challenges reflect a broader tension between law and reality in modern internal conflicts. It concludes by recommending legal reforms, enhanced IHL training for security forces, and greater humanitarian engagement with non-state actors to ensure better protection of civilians and adherence to humanitarian norms.

International Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 9(1)
Benson Idahosa University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.