Model calibration and evaluation via optimal subsampling using electronic health record data

Abstract A common challenge for validating risk prediction models using electronic health record (EHR) data is that labels for the predicted outcome are not directly available. Towards efficient and unbiased model validation, we study optimal sampling designs for efficiently labelling an informative subset of patients in an EHR cohort. Given a pre-specified number of outcome labels, our design aims to minimize the asymptotic variance of an improved inverse probability weighted (‘I-IPW’) estimator for predictive accuracy metrics. Implementation of the sampling requires accurate risk estimates and the predictive accuracy metric of interest. We therefore propose to implement sampling in two steps. First a portion of the target number of labels is acquired by applying entropy sampling to a random subset of the cohort. These initial labels are used to calibrate risk estimates and obtain an initial estimate of the predictive accuracy metric, which are used to inform optimal sampling of the remaining target number of labels. The final estimate of the predictive accuracy metrics is obtained by applying the I-IPW estimator to the cohort and all acquired labels pooled together. Results from simulation studies and application to a real EHR dataset indicate superior efficiency of the proposed sampling design and I-IPW estimator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnag036
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model calibration and evaluation via optimal subsampling using electronic health record data

Joochul Lee, Daniel J Rader, Guorong Dai, Jinbo Chen
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Model calibration and evaluation via optimal subsampling using electronic health record data

Joochul Lee, Daniel J Rader, Guorong Dai, Jinbo Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract A common challenge for validating risk prediction models using electronic health record (EHR) data is that labels for the predicted outcome are not directly available. Towards efficient and unbiased model validation, we study optimal sampling designs for efficiently labelling an informative subset of patients in an EHR cohort. Given a pre-specified number of outcome labels, our design aims to minimize the asymptotic variance of an improved inverse probability weighted (‘I-IPW’) estimator for predictive accuracy metrics. Implementation of the sampling requires accurate risk estimates and the predictive accuracy metric of interest. We therefore propose to implement sampling in two steps. First a portion of the target number of labels is acquired by applying entropy sampling to a random subset of the cohort. These initial labels are used to calibrate risk estimates and obtain an initial estimate of the predictive accuracy metric, which are used to inform optimal sampling of the remaining target number of labels. The final estimate of the predictive accuracy metrics is obtained by applying the I-IPW estimator to the cohort and all acquired labels pooled together. Results from simulation studies and application to a real EHR dataset indicate superior efficiency of the proposed sampling design and I-IPW estimator.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Fudan University (CN), Translational Therapeutics (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.