Establishing a Microfiber Recovery Rate in Human Lung Tissue

Microplastics (<5 mm) are an increasing concern for environmental and human health, continuously detected in ecosystems worldwide and a variety of human tissues. While health effects remain unclear, experimental studies on microplastic particles have suggested adverse outcomes. Microplastic fibers, which shed from everyday items, are more toxic than particles and twice as prevalent, yet remain understudied. Microplastic studies vary widely and use various extraction techniques, with few validating recovery accuracy. These limited recovery studies primarily examine particles, raising concerns about the true abundance of microfibers. This study establishes baseline recovery rates of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) microfibers of varying lengths from formalin-fixed human cadaveric lung tissue. Following enzymatic and oxidative digestion, PET microfibers showed a recovery rate of 47%, while 87% of PP microfibers was recovered. Chemical alterations were assessed using laser direct infrared (LDIR) spectroscopy; optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluated physical changes post-digestion. These findings provide insights into microfiber recovery, highlight potential over- and underestimations, and characterize the chemical and physical behavior of fibers within human tissue studies. Establishing accurate recovery methods is essential for advancing microfiber toxicology research and assessing potential health risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microplastics
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5010046
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing a Microfiber Recovery Rate in Human Lung Tissue

Karen E. Samonds, Kara Coffman-Rea, Kylie Babin-Howard
Microplastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Establishing a Microfiber Recovery Rate in Human Lung Tissue

Karen E. Samonds, Kara Coffman-Rea, Kylie Babin-Howard
article en

Abstract

Microplastics (<5 mm) are an increasing concern for environmental and human health, continuously detected in ecosystems worldwide and a variety of human tissues. While health effects remain unclear, experimental studies on microplastic particles have suggested adverse outcomes. Microplastic fibers, which shed from everyday items, are more toxic than particles and twice as prevalent, yet remain understudied. Microplastic studies vary widely and use various extraction techniques, with few validating recovery accuracy. These limited recovery studies primarily examine particles, raising concerns about the true abundance of microfibers. This study establishes baseline recovery rates of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) microfibers of varying lengths from formalin-fixed human cadaveric lung tissue. Following enzymatic and oxidative digestion, PET microfibers showed a recovery rate of 47%, while 87% of PP microfibers was recovered. Chemical alterations were assessed using laser direct infrared (LDIR) spectroscopy; optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluated physical changes post-digestion. These findings provide insights into microfiber recovery, highlight potential over- and underestimations, and characterize the chemical and physical behavior of fibers within human tissue studies. Establishing accurate recovery methods is essential for advancing microfiber toxicology research and assessing potential health risks.

MicroplasticsVol. 5(1)
Northern Illinois University (US), American Osteopathic Association (US), University of Guam (GU)
National Science Foundation, Northern Illinois University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.