Geosite Assessment for Geotourism Purposes: Case Study of Ida Madra Geopark, Türkiye

This study was conducted to evaluate some of the geosites in the Ida Madra Geopark for geotourism purposes. The Kubalikova (2013) method was used to assess the geosites for geotourism purposes. Using this method, 20 geosites were scored in five main categories and subcategories: scientific and ethical values, educational value, economic value, conservation value, and aesthetic value. Scores ranged from 9.00 to 18.25. The Kaz Mountain received the highest score, while the Taştepe basalt columns received the lowest. According to these results, geosites with higher scores attract more visitors. They also contribute more economically to the local community through geotourism. Efforts should also be made to address the shortcomings of low-scoring geosites, increase their geotourism capabilities, and ensure that the Geopark provides greater financial support to local communities through geotourism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoheritage
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01278-7
Primary Topic
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geosite Assessment for Geotourism Purposes: Case Study of Ida Madra Geopark, Türkiye

Abdullah Soykan, İsa Cürebal, Recep Efe
Geoheritage
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
article

Geosite Assessment for Geotourism Purposes: Case Study of Ida Madra Geopark, Türkiye

Abdullah Soykan, İsa Cürebal, Recep Efe
article en

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate some of the geosites in the Ida Madra Geopark for geotourism purposes. The Kubalikova (2013) method was used to assess the geosites for geotourism purposes. Using this method, 20 geosites were scored in five main categories and subcategories: scientific and ethical values, educational value, economic value, conservation value, and aesthetic value. Scores ranged from 9.00 to 18.25. The Kaz Mountain received the highest score, while the Taştepe basalt columns received the lowest. According to these results, geosites with higher scores attract more visitors. They also contribute more economically to the local community through geotourism. Efforts should also be made to address the shortcomings of low-scoring geosites, increase their geotourism capabilities, and ensure that the Geopark provides greater financial support to local communities through geotourism.

GeoheritageVol. 18(2)
University of Turku (FI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.