Feline leukemia virus point-of-care lateral flow tests have low positive predictive value in apparently healthy shelter cats

This study aimed to determine the true prevalence of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections in apparently healthy and sick shelter cats in Mississippi and estimate the predictive value of a lateral flow test results at the estimated true prevalences to guide testing recommendations. Blood samples (<i>n</i> = 383) were collected from a convenience sample of healthy and sick cats from February 2021 to July 2023. Blood serum samples from both apparently healthy and sick cats were tested for FeLV using lateral flow and insulated isothermal PCR (iiPCR) testing methods. Bayesian latent class modeling was used to estimate test performance and predictive value in both populations. The estimated true prevalence of FeLV in apparently healthy cats was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1%, 2.2%) and 5.3% (95% CI 1.3%, 11.5%) in sick cats. At these prevalences, the estimated positive predictive value of FeLV in healthy cats was 40.1% (95% CI 4.1%, 85.2%) and 99.0% (95% CI 99.4%, 100%) in sick cats. Negative predictive value of FeLV in healthy cats was 79.8% (95% CI 45.2%, 96.8%) and 99.2% (95% CI 97.1%, 100%) in sick cats. The predictive value of a positive test is low for healthy cats. Serial testing may not meaningfully improve the positive predictive value. Positive and negative predictive values were better for sick cats and may have diagnostic utility. Current testing methods may not be adequate for controlling the disease in population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1752228
Primary Topic
HIV Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feline leukemia virus point-of-care lateral flow tests have low positive predictive value in apparently healthy shelter cats

David R. Smith, Hannah E. Urig, Kimberly Woodruff, W. Cooper Brookshire
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
HIV Research and Treatment
article

Feline leukemia virus point-of-care lateral flow tests have low positive predictive value in apparently healthy shelter cats

David R. Smith, Hannah E. Urig, Kimberly Woodruff, W. Cooper Brookshire
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the true prevalence of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections in apparently healthy and sick shelter cats in Mississippi and estimate the predictive value of a lateral flow test results at the estimated true prevalences to guide testing recommendations. Blood samples (<i>n</i> = 383) were collected from a convenience sample of healthy and sick cats from February 2021 to July 2023. Blood serum samples from both apparently healthy and sick cats were tested for FeLV using lateral flow and insulated isothermal PCR (iiPCR) testing methods. Bayesian latent class modeling was used to estimate test performance and predictive value in both populations. The estimated true prevalence of FeLV in apparently healthy cats was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1%, 2.2%) and 5.3% (95% CI 1.3%, 11.5%) in sick cats. At these prevalences, the estimated positive predictive value of FeLV in healthy cats was 40.1% (95% CI 4.1%, 85.2%) and 99.0% (95% CI 99.4%, 100%) in sick cats. Negative predictive value of FeLV in healthy cats was 79.8% (95% CI 45.2%, 96.8%) and 99.2% (95% CI 97.1%, 100%) in sick cats. The predictive value of a positive test is low for healthy cats. Serial testing may not meaningfully improve the positive predictive value. Positive and negative predictive values were better for sick cats and may have diagnostic utility. Current testing methods may not be adequate for controlling the disease in population.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 13
Mississippi State University (US)
Mississippi State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
HIV Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.