What Value Do Dutch Citizens Place on Health Interventions That Provide Greater Health Gains to Lower-Income Groups? A Discrete Choice Experiment

Background: Reimbursement decisions for new health interventions focus on maximizing health gains, with limited attention to who benefits from these gains or the impact on income related health inequalities. This study aimed to examine the preferences of Dutch citizens regarding the distribution of health gains of new interventions across income groups. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was completed by 614 Dutch adults. Respondents were presented with 12 choice tasks. In each choice task, they were asked to choose between two health interventions that differed on the following attributes: total healthy life years gained, distribution of healthy life years gained across income groups, additional costs in terms of health insurance premium increases and whether the intervention was curative or preventive. Preferences were estimated using multinomial logit (MNL) models, relative attribute importance, willingness-to-pay, and willingness-to-trade total health gains. Preference heterogeneity was examined using latent class (LC) analyses. Results: Respondents found the distribution of health gains by income the most important attribute in their decision between health interventions (relative importance [RI] = 40.5%, 95% CI: 38.3%–42.7%). Overall, respondents preferred an equal distribution of healthy life years gained across income groups (βhigher income groups = -1.427, 95% CI: -1.547–-1.307; βlower-income groups = -0.315, 95% CI: -0.395–-0.235). A health intervention should yield 14 283 (95% CI: 10 463–18, 102) additional healthy life years or reduce the yearly health insurance premium by €39.96 (95% CI: €29.03–€50.89) if it mainly favors lower-income groups. Preventive interventions were generally preferred over equally effective or more effective curative interventions (βprevention = 0.270, 95% CI: 0.204–0.336). While preferences displayed a similar direction across LCs, the classes differed in the RI assigned to the attributes. Conclusion: Our findings suggest societal support for interventions that prioritize preventive programs over equally effective or more effective curative interventions and prioritize interventions that provide equal benefits across different income groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.9095
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Value Do Dutch Citizens Place on Health Interventions That Provide Greater Health Gains to Lower-Income Groups? A Discrete Choice Experiment

Mariëlle Cloïn, Iris Meulman, Polder Jj, Ellen Uiters et al.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

What Value Do Dutch Citizens Place on Health Interventions That Provide Greater Health Gains to Lower-Income Groups? A Discrete Choice Experiment

Mariëlle Cloïn, Iris Meulman, Polder Jj, Ellen Uiters, Adriënne H. Rotteveel, Niek Stadhouders
article en

Abstract

Background: Reimbursement decisions for new health interventions focus on maximizing health gains, with limited attention to who benefits from these gains or the impact on income related health inequalities. This study aimed to examine the preferences of Dutch citizens regarding the distribution of health gains of new interventions across income groups. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was completed by 614 Dutch adults. Respondents were presented with 12 choice tasks. In each choice task, they were asked to choose between two health interventions that differed on the following attributes: total healthy life years gained, distribution of healthy life years gained across income groups, additional costs in terms of health insurance premium increases and whether the intervention was curative or preventive. Preferences were estimated using multinomial logit (MNL) models, relative attribute importance, willingness-to-pay, and willingness-to-trade total health gains. Preference heterogeneity was examined using latent class (LC) analyses. Results: Respondents found the distribution of health gains by income the most important attribute in their decision between health interventions (relative importance [RI] = 40.5%, 95% CI: 38.3%–42.7%). Overall, respondents preferred an equal distribution of healthy life years gained across income groups (βhigher income groups = -1.427, 95% CI: -1.547–-1.307; βlower-income groups = -0.315, 95% CI: -0.395–-0.235). A health intervention should yield 14 283 (95% CI: 10 463–18, 102) additional healthy life years or reduce the yearly health insurance premium by €39.96 (95% CI: €29.03–€50.89) if it mainly favors lower-income groups. Preventive interventions were generally preferred over equally effective or more effective curative interventions (βprevention = 0.270, 95% CI: 0.204–0.336). While preferences displayed a similar direction across LCs, the classes differed in the RI assigned to the attributes. Conclusion: Our findings suggest societal support for interventions that prioritize preventive programs over equally effective or more effective curative interventions and prioritize interventions that provide equal benefits across different income groups.

International Journal of Health Policy and ManagementVol. 15
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Tilburg University (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Netherlands School of Public Administration (NL), Department of Health (ZA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.