Cost‐Benefit Analysis of the European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in Fertilizer Trade

ABSTRACT The carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), launching 2026, will charge EU importers for embedded carbon emissions, aiming to reduce emissions but raising import costs. Shifts in demand following implementation may reduce carbon emissions, but importers will bear the cost of increased prices. This study examines and weighs the economic costs and environmental benefits of the CBAM in a fertilizer sector‐specific policy analysis, testing whether the reduction of imported carbon emissions justifies the cost to EU consumers. To evaluate this trade‐off, EU import demand is modeled and analyzed before and after CBAM credits are included in the import price. Economic costs are evaluated through a welfare analysis calculating the decline in surplus due to reduced imports. Environmental benefits are calculated by determining the decreases in fertilizer demand, valued at the social cost of carbon (SCC) to compare directly with economic costs. The baseline scenario results show that the cost of the CBAM, equal to $4.04 billion, outweighs the benefit, equal to $2.58 billion, by $1.46 billion annually, when using a CBAM credit cost of $73.5 per metric ton CO 2 and a SCC value of $254 per metric ton CO 2 . However, sensitivity analysis reveals that the CBAM benefit outweighs the cost when CBAM credits cost $91.8 per metric ton CO 2 or the SCC is valued at $700 per metric ton CO 2 . This study helps relevant stakeholders, as trade partners examine strategies and EU agribusiness prepares for increasing input prices. In light of new EU agricultural goals aimed at reducing synthetic fertilizers, the CBAM's impact on demand for fertilizer imports could provide an opportunity for organic fertilizers as a substitute given policy support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70081
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost‐Benefit Analysis of the European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in Fertilizer Trade

S. Cho, Md Deluair Hossen, Natalie Crisci
Agribusiness
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Cost‐Benefit Analysis of the European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in Fertilizer Trade

S. Cho, Md Deluair Hossen, Natalie Crisci
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), launching 2026, will charge EU importers for embedded carbon emissions, aiming to reduce emissions but raising import costs. Shifts in demand following implementation may reduce carbon emissions, but importers will bear the cost of increased prices. This study examines and weighs the economic costs and environmental benefits of the CBAM in a fertilizer sector‐specific policy analysis, testing whether the reduction of imported carbon emissions justifies the cost to EU consumers. To evaluate this trade‐off, EU import demand is modeled and analyzed before and after CBAM credits are included in the import price. Economic costs are evaluated through a welfare analysis calculating the decline in surplus due to reduced imports. Environmental benefits are calculated by determining the decreases in fertilizer demand, valued at the social cost of carbon (SCC) to compare directly with economic costs. The baseline scenario results show that the cost of the CBAM, equal to $4.04 billion, outweighs the benefit, equal to $2.58 billion, by $1.46 billion annually, when using a CBAM credit cost of $73.5 per metric ton CO 2 and a SCC value of $254 per metric ton CO 2 . However, sensitivity analysis reveals that the CBAM benefit outweighs the cost when CBAM credits cost $91.8 per metric ton CO 2 or the SCC is valued at $700 per metric ton CO 2 . This study helps relevant stakeholders, as trade partners examine strategies and EU agribusiness prepares for increasing input prices. In light of new EU agricultural goals aimed at reducing synthetic fertilizers, the CBAM's impact on demand for fertilizer imports could provide an opportunity for organic fertilizers as a substitute given policy support.

Agribusiness
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost‐Benefit Analysis of the European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in Fertilizer Trade — S. Cho, Md Deluair Hossen, et al. · Agribusiness (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS