Accountability for the green transition: the (non)role of transition plans

Purpose This paper aims to examine how European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) require green-transition reporting, in particular how the concepts of time and space/place are mobilized and connected with directions (targets), responses (actions and resources) and impacts and how changes in ESRS or sustainability-reporting practice may catalyze decarbonization. Design/methodology/approach This paper regards target-setting and transition plans as sustainability frames shaped by temporal markers connected to material effects (externalities) and emphasize that mechanisms connecting time and space/place, and thus constituting traces, are promising routes toward accountability for externalities. Findings This paper highlights shortcomings in the traces offered by ESRS in response to climate-change challenges. These shortcomings are related predominantly to the scant focus on understanding how challenges can be addressed through future responses. These shortcomings will most likely persist following the forthcoming ESRS revision. This paper suggests other ways of linking material responses with material impacts over time to establish and thus incentivize short-term actions taken in response to grand challenges. Practical implications Disclosing the feasibility (uncertainty) of future decarbonization responses and explaining the speed of decarbonization through decarbonization curves and cumulated emissions over time would provide a stronger basis than the current regime does for holding companies accountable. Social implications The European sustainability-reporting regime requires effort from regulators, preparers and stakeholders. This study identifies critical shortcomings in this endeavor. Originality/value Previous studies have focused on European Union and European Financial Reporting Advisory Group efforts regarding the standardization of overarching principles. This study focuses on ESRS and sustainability-reporting content and their potential for driving the green transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-07-2024-0711
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accountability for the green transition: the (non)role of transition plans

Mia Kaspersen
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Accountability for the green transition: the (non)role of transition plans

Mia Kaspersen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine how European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) require green-transition reporting, in particular how the concepts of time and space/place are mobilized and connected with directions (targets), responses (actions and resources) and impacts and how changes in ESRS or sustainability-reporting practice may catalyze decarbonization. Design/methodology/approach This paper regards target-setting and transition plans as sustainability frames shaped by temporal markers connected to material effects (externalities) and emphasize that mechanisms connecting time and space/place, and thus constituting traces, are promising routes toward accountability for externalities. Findings This paper highlights shortcomings in the traces offered by ESRS in response to climate-change challenges. These shortcomings are related predominantly to the scant focus on understanding how challenges can be addressed through future responses. These shortcomings will most likely persist following the forthcoming ESRS revision. This paper suggests other ways of linking material responses with material impacts over time to establish and thus incentivize short-term actions taken in response to grand challenges. Practical implications Disclosing the feasibility (uncertainty) of future decarbonization responses and explaining the speed of decarbonization through decarbonization curves and cumulated emissions over time would provide a stronger basis than the current regime does for holding companies accountable. Social implications The European sustainability-reporting regime requires effort from regulators, preparers and stakeholders. This study identifies critical shortcomings in this endeavor. Originality/value Previous studies have focused on European Union and European Financial Reporting Advisory Group efforts regarding the standardization of overarching principles. This study focuses on ESRS and sustainability-reporting content and their potential for driving the green transition.

Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.