Patterns of X-Ray and <i>γ</i> -Ray Flares: From Blazar to Magnetar and Sun

Abstract Using Gaussian process methods, we analyzed the light curves of three extreme solar X-ray flares observed by the RHESSI satellite. Their variability characteristics were then compared with those of HXMT-HE X-ray burst (XRB; in SGR 1935+2154) associated with fast radio burst (FRB) 200428 and blazar γ -ray giant flares to investigate the origins of these extreme flaring events. The variability patterns of the solar X-ray flares follow the stochastically driven damped simple harmonic oscillator model. The derived timescales t B_steep and t B_flat (corresponding to power spectral density breaks) are in the range of 4–7 and 16–53 s, respectively. The FRB-associated HXMT-HE burst has a Q value near 0.3, matching those of the solar flares that occurred on 2002 July 23 (flare 1) and 2003 November 3 (flare 2). By contrast, blazar γ -ray giant flares show Q &gt; 0.3, similar to the solar flare that occurred on 2014 February 25 (flare 3). We proposed that the critically damped state of the system may be the condition triggering the association between the XRB in SGR 1935+2154 and the FRB. In this scenario, the critical damping Q value of the system is around 0.3, not the theoretical 0.5. The similarity in Q values might imply that the FRB-associated HXMT-HE XRB and solar X-ray flares 1 and 2 share comparable dynamic behavior, while blazar γ -ray flares and solar X-ray flare 3 exhibit another distinct but similar dynamic behavior. Like solar X-ray flares, these extreme flares may all be related to the magnetic reconnection process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae2859
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of X-Ray and γ -Ray Flares: From Blazar to Magnetar and Sun

L. Y. Tao, Niansheng Tang, Ping Zhang, Shun Zhou et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

Patterns of X-Ray and γ -Ray Flares: From Blazar to Magnetar and Sun

L. Y. Tao, Niansheng Tang, Ping Zhang, Shun Zhou, Li 力 Zhang 张, Ruijing 睿婧 Tang 唐, Dahai 大海 Yan 闫, Lijuan 丽娟 Dong 董, Haiyun 海云 Zhang 张
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using Gaussian process methods, we analyzed the light curves of three extreme solar X-ray flares observed by the RHESSI satellite. Their variability characteristics were then compared with those of HXMT-HE X-ray burst (XRB; in SGR 1935+2154) associated with fast radio burst (FRB) 200428 and blazar γ -ray giant flares to investigate the origins of these extreme flaring events. The variability patterns of the solar X-ray flares follow the stochastically driven damped simple harmonic oscillator model. The derived timescales t B_steep and t B_flat (corresponding to power spectral density breaks) are in the range of 4–7 and 16–53 s, respectively. The FRB-associated HXMT-HE burst has a Q value near 0.3, matching those of the solar flares that occurred on 2002 July 23 (flare 1) and 2003 November 3 (flare 2). By contrast, blazar γ -ray giant flares show Q &gt; 0.3, similar to the solar flare that occurred on 2014 February 25 (flare 3). We proposed that the critically damped state of the system may be the condition triggering the association between the XRB in SGR 1935+2154 and the FRB. In this scenario, the critical damping Q value of the system is around 0.3, not the theoretical 0.5. The similarity in Q values might imply that the FRB-associated HXMT-HE XRB and solar X-ray flares 1 and 2 share comparable dynamic behavior, while blazar γ -ray flares and solar X-ray flare 3 exhibit another distinct but similar dynamic behavior. Like solar X-ray flares, these extreme flares may all be related to the magnetic reconnection process.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 999(2)
Yunnan University (CN), Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (CN), Institute of High Energy Physics (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN), Hubei University of Technology (CN), Hubei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.