Evaluation of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) Plus Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH) and rFSH Plus Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG) Combination Therapies in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory outcomes of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and rFSH plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) combination therapies during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in patients with poor ovarian response, with the live birth rate defined as the primary clinical endpoint. Methods: This retrospective study included 90 patients who were diagnosed with poor ovarian response based on the Bologna criteria (which were also categorized as Poseidon Groups 3 and 4) and who met the inclusion requirements. Patients were divided into two groups based on the gonadotropin combination used: rFSH+rLH (n=49) and rFSH+HMG (n=41). Stimulation parameters, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, and live birth rates were analyzed and compared. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding age, hormone levels, antral follicle count (AFC), duration of COH, number of retrieved oocytes, M2 oocyte ratio, fertilization rate, or live birth rates (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that both rFSH+rLH and rFSH+HMG combinations yielded similar clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Given the observational nature of this study, these results should be interpreted with caution, and treatment protocols should remain individualized.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104714
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) Plus Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH) and rFSH Plus Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG) Combination Therapies in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation

Ebru Ersoy, Muhammed Hanifi Bademkiran, Duygu Turk, Mustafa Demir
Cureus
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Evaluation of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) Plus Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH) and rFSH Plus Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG) Combination Therapies in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation

Ebru Ersoy, Muhammed Hanifi Bademkiran, Duygu Turk, Mustafa Demir
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory outcomes of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and rFSH plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) combination therapies during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in patients with poor ovarian response, with the live birth rate defined as the primary clinical endpoint. Methods: This retrospective study included 90 patients who were diagnosed with poor ovarian response based on the Bologna criteria (which were also categorized as Poseidon Groups 3 and 4) and who met the inclusion requirements. Patients were divided into two groups based on the gonadotropin combination used: rFSH+rLH (n=49) and rFSH+HMG (n=41). Stimulation parameters, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, and live birth rates were analyzed and compared. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding age, hormone levels, antral follicle count (AFC), duration of COH, number of retrieved oocytes, M2 oocyte ratio, fertilization rate, or live birth rates (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that both rFSH+rLH and rFSH+HMG combinations yielded similar clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Given the observational nature of this study, these results should be interpreted with caution, and treatment protocols should remain individualized.

Cureus
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.