The Tarim Geopuzzle in the Neoproterozoic Rodinia Supercontinent: A Synthesis Review

The Neoproterozoic era marks a turning point in Earth history when the formation and breakup of supercontinent Rodinia drastically changed the configuration of plates and life environments. While most large cratons have been well placed within the Rodinia reconstructions through geological and paleomagnetic constraints, the former positions of many smaller micro-continents, such as those across the Asia region, remain poorly understood. Although the Tarim Craton played a vital role in linking the assembly and dispersal of the Rodinia supercontinent, a long-lasting controversy remains regarding the tectonic configuration of the Tarim Craton in the Rodinia mosaic. In this paper we synthesize the Meso- to Neoproterozoic stratigraphy and magmatism of the Tarim Craton and evaluate the current tectonic and paleogeographic models addressing the “Tarim geopuzzle” within Rodinia configuration. The Central Tianshan and Yili blocks are considered part of a Wilson Cycle evolution of the Tarim Craton during this time interval. Key geological features common to both the “ Great Tarim ” and western Laurentia include: 780–760 Ma mafic dike swarms along the northern edge of the Tarim Craton and the 780 Ma Gunbarrel Large Igneous Province; plume-driven continental rifting episode and synchronous basin initiation along conjugate margins; a Mesoproterozoic granitoid belt in Central Tianshan that is comparable to the ∼1.4 Ga Granite–Rhyolite Belt in southern Laurentia; compatible source-to-sink systems in Mesoproterozoic basins; and, coeval ∼650–615 Ma magmatism with rift-to-drift tectonics leading to passive margin development. Several key issues warrant focused investigation in future studies. These include the need to re-evaluate the ambiguous latest Mesoproterozoic Grenville-age orogeny in light of newly available zircon datasets; the nature and geodynamic significance of an Early Neoproterozoic intracontinental rifting event in southern Tarim that may record a two-stage rifting-amalgamation history within the core of Rodinia, involving initial separation from Australia followed by amalgamation with Laurentia; and, the significance of the apparent time lag (several tens of millions of years) between rift-to-drift tectonics and the paleomagnetically inferred Australia–Laurentia breakup. Addressing these issues will be critical for testing alternative paleogeographic reconstructions and for evaluating the viability of placing Tarim or other continental blocks in a core position within the Rodinia supercontinent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Geological Society
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2025-198
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Tarim Geopuzzle in the Neoproterozoic Rodinia Supercontinent: A Synthesis Review

Xiaotong Zhang, Caiyun Wang, Han-Lin Chen, Hong-Xiang Wu et al.
Journal of the Geological Society
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

The Tarim Geopuzzle in the Neoproterozoic Rodinia Supercontinent: A Synthesis Review

Xiaotong Zhang, Caiyun Wang, Han-Lin Chen, Hong-Xiang Wu, Yildirim Dilek
article en

Abstract

The Neoproterozoic era marks a turning point in Earth history when the formation and breakup of supercontinent Rodinia drastically changed the configuration of plates and life environments. While most large cratons have been well placed within the Rodinia reconstructions through geological and paleomagnetic constraints, the former positions of many smaller micro-continents, such as those across the Asia region, remain poorly understood. Although the Tarim Craton played a vital role in linking the assembly and dispersal of the Rodinia supercontinent, a long-lasting controversy remains regarding the tectonic configuration of the Tarim Craton in the Rodinia mosaic. In this paper we synthesize the Meso- to Neoproterozoic stratigraphy and magmatism of the Tarim Craton and evaluate the current tectonic and paleogeographic models addressing the “Tarim geopuzzle” within Rodinia configuration. The Central Tianshan and Yili blocks are considered part of a Wilson Cycle evolution of the Tarim Craton during this time interval. Key geological features common to both the “ Great Tarim ” and western Laurentia include: 780–760 Ma mafic dike swarms along the northern edge of the Tarim Craton and the 780 Ma Gunbarrel Large Igneous Province; plume-driven continental rifting episode and synchronous basin initiation along conjugate margins; a Mesoproterozoic granitoid belt in Central Tianshan that is comparable to the ∼1.4 Ga Granite–Rhyolite Belt in southern Laurentia; compatible source-to-sink systems in Mesoproterozoic basins; and, coeval ∼650–615 Ma magmatism with rift-to-drift tectonics leading to passive margin development. Several key issues warrant focused investigation in future studies. These include the need to re-evaluate the ambiguous latest Mesoproterozoic Grenville-age orogeny in light of newly available zircon datasets; the nature and geodynamic significance of an Early Neoproterozoic intracontinental rifting event in southern Tarim that may record a two-stage rifting-amalgamation history within the core of Rodinia, involving initial separation from Australia followed by amalgamation with Laurentia; and, the significance of the apparent time lag (several tens of millions of years) between rift-to-drift tectonics and the paleomagnetically inferred Australia–Laurentia breakup. Addressing these issues will be critical for testing alternative paleogeographic reconstructions and for evaluating the viability of placing Tarim or other continental blocks in a core position within the Rodinia supercontinent.

Journal of the Geological Society
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN), Beijing Museum of Natural History (CN), Department of Chemistry and Earth Sciences (BY), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Zhejiang University (CN), Miami University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.