EXPRESS: Effects of initial experiences on risky choice

When people make risky choices based on prior experience, biases in learning and memory can affect their preferences. One such bias is the primacy effect, whereby outcomes experienced during initial learning disproportionately affect later memory and choice. Here we investigated potential primacy effects with two features of risky options: outcome probability and relative value. In the first two experiments (total N = 382), the order of experiencing different outcome probabilities was varied across three groups, and neither experiment revealed any primacy effects. In the last experiment (total N = 390), the relative value of outcomes was manipulated by including an extra wildcard option. This wildcard option sometimes had more extreme outcomes than the rest of the choice set and sometimes had more moderate outcomes. The order of experiencing the more-extreme wildcard option was manipulated to evaluate potential primacy effects. During initial learning, including the more-extreme wildcard option affected choice as compared to a group with a wildcard that yielded moderate outcomes; adding that same more-extreme wildcard later in the session, however, had no effect on choice. Together, these results suggest that risk preferences based on relative value show a lasting primacy effect, but that learning about outcome probabilities is more continuously updated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261432610
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Effects of initial experiences on risky choice

Nick Simonsen, Jeffrey M. Pisklak, A. Mason, Elliot A. Ludvig et al.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

EXPRESS: Effects of initial experiences on risky choice

Nick Simonsen, Jeffrey M. Pisklak, A. Mason, Elliot A. Ludvig, Jason Long, Neil McMillan, Christopher R Madan
article en

Abstract

When people make risky choices based on prior experience, biases in learning and memory can affect their preferences. One such bias is the primacy effect, whereby outcomes experienced during initial learning disproportionately affect later memory and choice. Here we investigated potential primacy effects with two features of risky options: outcome probability and relative value. In the first two experiments (total N = 382), the order of experiencing different outcome probabilities was varied across three groups, and neither experiment revealed any primacy effects. In the last experiment (total N = 390), the relative value of outcomes was manipulated by including an extra wildcard option. This wildcard option sometimes had more extreme outcomes than the rest of the choice set and sometimes had more moderate outcomes. The order of experiencing the more-extreme wildcard option was manipulated to evaluate potential primacy effects. During initial learning, including the more-extreme wildcard option affected choice as compared to a group with a wildcard that yielded moderate outcomes; adding that same more-extreme wildcard later in the session, however, had no effect on choice. Together, these results suggest that risk preferences based on relative value show a lasting primacy effect, but that learning about outcome probabilities is more continuously updated.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Alberta (CA), University of Warwick (GB), University of Bath (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.