GrimACE: automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice

Pain and welfare monitoring is essential for ethical animal testing, but current cage-side assessments are qualitative and subjective. Here we present the GrimACE, a fully standardized and automated cage-side monitoring tool for mice, the most widely used animals in research. The GrimACE uses computer vision to provide automated mouse grimace scale (MGS) assessment together with pose estimation in a safe, dark environment. We validated the system by analyzing pain after brain surgeries (craniotomies) with head implants under two analgesia regimes. Human-expert and automated MGS scores showed very high correlation (Pearson's r = 0.87). Both expert and automated scores revealed that a moderate increase in pain can be detected for up to 48 h after surgeries, but that both a single dose of meloxicam (5 mg/kg subcutaneuously) or three doses of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) + meloxicam (5 mg/kg subcutaneuously) provide adequate and comparable pain management. Simultaneous pose estimation demonstrated that mice receiving buprenorphine + meloxicam showed increased movement 4 h after surgery, indicative of hyperactivity, a well-known side effect of opioid treatment. Significant weight loss was also detected in the buprenorphine + meloxicam treatment group compared with the meloxicam-only group. In addition, detailed BehaviorFlow analysis and automated MGS scoring of control animals suggests that habituation to GrimACE is unnecessary, and that measurements can be repeated multiple times, ensuring standardized postoperative recovery monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lab Animal
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-026-01695-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
45.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GrimACE: automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice

Runzhong Zhang, Mattia Privitera, Katharina Hohlbaum, Justine Leonardi et al.
1 citations
Lab Animal
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
45.92
article

GrimACE: automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice

Runzhong Zhang, Mattia Privitera, Katharina Hohlbaum, Justine Leonardi, Clara Bekemeier, Johannes Bohacek, Marcel Schmutz, Fabienne K. Roessler, Rebecca Waag, Oliver Sturman, Tom Lorimer, Alina-Mariuca Marinescu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pain and welfare monitoring is essential for ethical animal testing, but current cage-side assessments are qualitative and subjective. Here we present the GrimACE, a fully standardized and automated cage-side monitoring tool for mice, the most widely used animals in research. The GrimACE uses computer vision to provide automated mouse grimace scale (MGS) assessment together with pose estimation in a safe, dark environment. We validated the system by analyzing pain after brain surgeries (craniotomies) with head implants under two analgesia regimes. Human-expert and automated MGS scores showed very high correlation (Pearson's r = 0.87). Both expert and automated scores revealed that a moderate increase in pain can be detected for up to 48 h after surgeries, but that both a single dose of meloxicam (5 mg/kg subcutaneuously) or three doses of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) + meloxicam (5 mg/kg subcutaneuously) provide adequate and comparable pain management. Simultaneous pose estimation demonstrated that mice receiving buprenorphine + meloxicam showed increased movement 4 h after surgery, indicative of hyperactivity, a well-known side effect of opioid treatment. Significant weight loss was also detected in the buprenorphine + meloxicam treatment group compared with the meloxicam-only group. In addition, detailed BehaviorFlow analysis and automated MGS scoring of control animals suggests that habituation to GrimACE is unnecessary, and that measurements can be repeated multiple times, ensuring standardized postoperative recovery monitoring.

Lab Animal
Animal Welfare Institute (US), University of Zurich (CH), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), ETH Zurich (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Botnar Research Centre for Child Health, University of Basel
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
45.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.