Analysis of Score Acquisition Status of Land Use and Transportation Credits in G-SEED for Non-Residential Buildings - Certification Trends from 2017 to 2024 -

This study examined the score attainment status of the Land Use and Transportation (LT) category for non-residential buildings-general buildings, office buildings, and school facilities-that obtained G-SEED preliminary certification between 2017 and 2024.The findings are as follows.First, none of the LT items showed an average attainment ratio of 70% or higher across all building types.However, Item 1.7 "Bicycle parking installation" achieved a high average ratio of 78.8% in office buildings and 68.2% in general buildings, whereas school facilities showed a significantly low ratio of 16.3%.Item 1.6 "Proximity to public transportation" showed relatively even ratios across all types (office: 76.4%, general buildings: 58.3%, schools: 58.8%).Second, Item 1.4 "Validity of countermeasures for solar access interference" recorded a zero-score ratio exceeding 50% in all building types, reaching 81% in office buildings, suggesting that solar-access strategies tend to receive lower priority during the design process.Items such as 1.1 "Ecological value of the existing site" and 1.2 "Avoidance of excessive underground development," which are affected by site conditions and urban density, also showed zero-score ratios above 50% in various building types.These results provide empirical evidence on the current operation of the LT category under the G-SEED system, revised in 2016, and are expected to inform future improvements and updates to the certification framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean housing association
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6107/jkha.2026.37.1.011
Primary Topic
Cultural and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Score Acquisition Status of Land Use and Transportation Credits in G-SEED for Non-Residential Buildings - Certification Trends from 2017 to 2024 -

Dae-Hee Jang, Kyung-Joo Cho, Sung-Mo Seo, Yo-Sun Yun
Journal of the Korean housing association
Cultural and Historical Studies
article

Analysis of Score Acquisition Status of Land Use and Transportation Credits in G-SEED for Non-Residential Buildings - Certification Trends from 2017 to 2024 -

Dae-Hee Jang, Kyung-Joo Cho, Sung-Mo Seo, Yo-Sun Yun
article en

Abstract

This study examined the score attainment status of the Land Use and Transportation (LT) category for non-residential buildings-general buildings, office buildings, and school facilities-that obtained G-SEED preliminary certification between 2017 and 2024.The findings are as follows.First, none of the LT items showed an average attainment ratio of 70% or higher across all building types.However, Item 1.7 "Bicycle parking installation" achieved a high average ratio of 78.8% in office buildings and 68.2% in general buildings, whereas school facilities showed a significantly low ratio of 16.3%.Item 1.6 "Proximity to public transportation" showed relatively even ratios across all types (office: 76.4%, general buildings: 58.3%, schools: 58.8%).Second, Item 1.4 "Validity of countermeasures for solar access interference" recorded a zero-score ratio exceeding 50% in all building types, reaching 81% in office buildings, suggesting that solar-access strategies tend to receive lower priority during the design process.Items such as 1.1 "Ecological value of the existing site" and 1.2 "Avoidance of excessive underground development," which are affected by site conditions and urban density, also showed zero-score ratios above 50% in various building types.These results provide empirical evidence on the current operation of the LT category under the G-SEED system, revised in 2016, and are expected to inform future improvements and updates to the certification framework.

Journal of the Korean housing associationVol. 37(1)
Korea Institute of Construction Technology
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Cultural and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.