Liquid carbon: legal standardisation in voluntary carbon markets

Voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) are at a watershed. Despite ongoing controversy, considerable political momentum seeks their expansion to raise finance for climate mitigation and adaptation in the Global South. Based on extensive interviews and document analysis, this article studies how legal experts attempt to render VCMs ‘liquid’. It focuses on a project at the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) which leverages its status as an intergovernmental organisation to clarify the elusive legal nature of these commodities. First, I show that the initiative frames its private law standardisation process as ‘non-regulatory’, although regulatory questions permeate the project. Second, it envisages the spatial (and legal) isolation of carbon credits from their places of origin. In effect, this leads to (1) the transformation of host countries’ legal frameworks, for example by encouraging land use reforms to secure property rights over sequestered carbon; and (2) inter-jurisdictional competition for financial services related to carbon credits – a form of ‘commercialised sovereignty’. In both cases, liquidity becomes a function of hierarchical legal space, shaping VCMs primarily as sites of financial speculation and experimentation. This renders their quality as legitimate and equitable sources of climate finance dubious.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance and Space
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2833115x.2026.2632881
Primary Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liquid carbon: legal standardisation in voluntary carbon markets

Lukas Bogner
Finance and Space
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
article

Liquid carbon: legal standardisation in voluntary carbon markets

Lukas Bogner
article en

Abstract

Voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) are at a watershed. Despite ongoing controversy, considerable political momentum seeks their expansion to raise finance for climate mitigation and adaptation in the Global South. Based on extensive interviews and document analysis, this article studies how legal experts attempt to render VCMs ‘liquid’. It focuses on a project at the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) which leverages its status as an intergovernmental organisation to clarify the elusive legal nature of these commodities. First, I show that the initiative frames its private law standardisation process as ‘non-regulatory’, although regulatory questions permeate the project. Second, it envisages the spatial (and legal) isolation of carbon credits from their places of origin. In effect, this leads to (1) the transformation of host countries’ legal frameworks, for example by encouraging land use reforms to secure property rights over sequestered carbon; and (2) inter-jurisdictional competition for financial services related to carbon credits – a form of ‘commercialised sovereignty’. In both cases, liquidity becomes a function of hierarchical legal space, shaping VCMs primarily as sites of financial speculation and experimentation. This renders their quality as legitimate and equitable sources of climate finance dubious.

Finance and SpaceVol. 3(1)
Roskilde University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.