Interlocking Directorate Networks and ESG Performance: Evidence from China

This study examines the impact of interlocking directorate networks on the ESG performance of listed companies in China, offering insights into the role of informal institutions in shaping sustainable business practices. Employing social network analysis and multiple regression methods, the results demonstrate that firms embedded in stronger interlocking directorate networks exhibit significantly superior ESG performance. Mechanism analysis identifies absorptive capacity as a key mediator, suggesting that network position improves ESG outcomes by enhancing a firm’s ability to assimilate and apply external knowledge. Furthermore, heterogeneity tests indicate that this positive effect is notably stronger among non-state-owned enterprises and firms where directors lack prior green experience. These findings have valuable implications for enterprises seeking to cultivate ESG competitive advantages in the era of network relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052533
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interlocking Directorate Networks and ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Xingshuai Wang, Chao Li, Zhe Zhang
Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Interlocking Directorate Networks and ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Xingshuai Wang, Chao Li, Zhe Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of interlocking directorate networks on the ESG performance of listed companies in China, offering insights into the role of informal institutions in shaping sustainable business practices. Employing social network analysis and multiple regression methods, the results demonstrate that firms embedded in stronger interlocking directorate networks exhibit significantly superior ESG performance. Mechanism analysis identifies absorptive capacity as a key mediator, suggesting that network position improves ESG outcomes by enhancing a firm’s ability to assimilate and apply external knowledge. Furthermore, heterogeneity tests indicate that this positive effect is notably stronger among non-state-owned enterprises and firms where directors lack prior green experience. These findings have valuable implications for enterprises seeking to cultivate ESG competitive advantages in the era of network relationships.

SustainabilityVol. 18(5)
Shandong University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.