Disaggregating innovation for sustainable development in ASEAN: Panel evidence on the moderating role of government effectiveness

With progress toward the 2030 Agenda faltering, many see innovation as a key to sustainable development. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) bloc represents a unique opportunity to examine how innovation capabilities drive sustainability in diverse economic and developmental contexts. Using panel data for ASEAN countries from 2011 to 2022, this study breaks down innovation into the seven pillars of the Global Innovation Index (GII) and investigates their impact on the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Index; with the objective of identifying which GII pillars most strongly predict SDG, while examining the moderating role of government effectiveness and controlling the impacts of gross national income per capita and foreign direct investment. Fixed effects models were used to analyse the data and supplemented by Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, addressing unobserved heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Results reveal that only Institutions and Infrastructure pillars exert a consistently positive impact on SDG performance. In contrast, Creative Outputs have a negative impact. Importantly, Government Effectiveness reverses the negative impact of Creative Outputs, so that this pillar becomes positive for SDG achievement, without significant moderation of the other six GII pillars when controlling for year effects. In conclusion, these findings contest the efficacy of universal innovation policies and underscore the imperative for nuanced, context‑specific ones. It is recommended that ASEAN governments prioritize institutional and infrastructural investments and develop tailored regulatory frameworks, such as green intellectual property regimes and digital economy standards, to harness the creative economy for inclusive, sustainable growth by explicitly integrating innovation strategies with governance reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344357
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disaggregating innovation for sustainable development in ASEAN: Panel evidence on the moderating role of government effectiveness

Nohman Khan, Ihtisham Ullah, Pureheart Ogheneogaga Irikefe, Ahmad Danial Zainudin et al.
PLoS ONE
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Disaggregating innovation for sustainable development in ASEAN: Panel evidence on the moderating role of government effectiveness

Nohman Khan, Ihtisham Ullah, Pureheart Ogheneogaga Irikefe, Ahmad Danial Zainudin, Mohammad Falahat, Bernard Ojonugwa Anthony
article en

Abstract

With progress toward the 2030 Agenda faltering, many see innovation as a key to sustainable development. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) bloc represents a unique opportunity to examine how innovation capabilities drive sustainability in diverse economic and developmental contexts. Using panel data for ASEAN countries from 2011 to 2022, this study breaks down innovation into the seven pillars of the Global Innovation Index (GII) and investigates their impact on the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Index; with the objective of identifying which GII pillars most strongly predict SDG, while examining the moderating role of government effectiveness and controlling the impacts of gross national income per capita and foreign direct investment. Fixed effects models were used to analyse the data and supplemented by Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, addressing unobserved heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Results reveal that only Institutions and Infrastructure pillars exert a consistently positive impact on SDG performance. In contrast, Creative Outputs have a negative impact. Importantly, Government Effectiveness reverses the negative impact of Creative Outputs, so that this pillar becomes positive for SDG achievement, without significant moderation of the other six GII pillars when controlling for year effects. In conclusion, these findings contest the efficacy of universal innovation policies and underscore the imperative for nuanced, context‑specific ones. It is recommended that ASEAN governments prioritize institutional and infrastructural investments and develop tailored regulatory frameworks, such as green intellectual property regimes and digital economy standards, to harness the creative economy for inclusive, sustainable growth by explicitly integrating innovation strategies with governance reforms.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (MY), Kampala International University (UG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.