The Effectiveness of Proposed Pedestrian-Friendly Vehicle Front-end Shapes and Their Corresponding Controlled Braking Methods in Protecting Pedestrian Ground Contact Injuries

Previous studies have obtained some pedestrian-friendly vehicle front-end shapes, which show good pedestrian protection ability, but their effectiveness in protecting pedestrian ground contact injury has not been evaluated yet. For this reason, a total of 6 vehicle front-end shapes, 3 each for ‘Good’ front-end shapes (G shapes) and ‘Poor’ front-end shapes (P shapes), and a simulation test sample are selected to design 72 groups of 144 simulations. The results show that compared with the P shapes, the G shapes have better protection against pedestrian-vehicle contact injuries but worse protection against pedestrian-ground contact injuries. The analysis finds that the direct cause of the difference in the protection effect of pedestrian-ground contact injury between the G and P shapes is that the change in the pedestrian's ground impact mechanism leads to the head hitting the ground earlier and at a greater speed, and also higher ground-related weighted injury cost of pelvis (WIC pelvis ), while the essential cause is most likely the change in the angle of rotation of the pedestrian after the contact due to the difference in the shape of the bumper of the two types of vehicle. In order to further reduce pedestrian-ground contact injuries for the G shapes, 7272 simulations are designed and a simple vehicle braking control method for a specific vehicle model is proposed by combining optimization and regression. Experiments based on the simulation test sample show that a maximum reduction of 84% of the ground-related WIC can be achieved, with the proportion of safe mechanisms up to 74%. Experiments based on the new simulation test sample show a maximum reduction of 43% of ground-related head injury criterion (HIC), and the experiments show that the proportion of safe mechanisms reaches 78%, which verifies the good effect and adaptability of the proposed method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjme.2025.100001
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of Proposed Pedestrian-Friendly Vehicle Front-end Shapes and Their Corresponding Controlled Braking Methods in Protecting Pedestrian Ground Contact Injuries

Dezhuo Chen, Simms Ciaran, Tiefang Zou, Chong Zeng
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

The Effectiveness of Proposed Pedestrian-Friendly Vehicle Front-end Shapes and Their Corresponding Controlled Braking Methods in Protecting Pedestrian Ground Contact Injuries

Dezhuo Chen, Simms Ciaran, Tiefang Zou, Chong Zeng
article en

Abstract

Previous studies have obtained some pedestrian-friendly vehicle front-end shapes, which show good pedestrian protection ability, but their effectiveness in protecting pedestrian ground contact injury has not been evaluated yet. For this reason, a total of 6 vehicle front-end shapes, 3 each for ‘Good’ front-end shapes (G shapes) and ‘Poor’ front-end shapes (P shapes), and a simulation test sample are selected to design 72 groups of 144 simulations. The results show that compared with the P shapes, the G shapes have better protection against pedestrian-vehicle contact injuries but worse protection against pedestrian-ground contact injuries. The analysis finds that the direct cause of the difference in the protection effect of pedestrian-ground contact injury between the G and P shapes is that the change in the pedestrian's ground impact mechanism leads to the head hitting the ground earlier and at a greater speed, and also higher ground-related weighted injury cost of pelvis (WIC pelvis ), while the essential cause is most likely the change in the angle of rotation of the pedestrian after the contact due to the difference in the shape of the bumper of the two types of vehicle. In order to further reduce pedestrian-ground contact injuries for the G shapes, 7272 simulations are designed and a simple vehicle braking control method for a specific vehicle model is proposed by combining optimization and regression. Experiments based on the simulation test sample show that a maximum reduction of 84% of the ground-related WIC can be achieved, with the proportion of safe mechanisms up to 74%. Experiments based on the new simulation test sample show a maximum reduction of 43% of ground-related head injury criterion (HIC), and the experiments show that the proportion of safe mechanisms reaches 78%, which verifies the good effect and adaptability of the proposed method.

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Trinity College Dublin (IE), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.