Validation of an AI Method for Automated Lymphoma Metabolic Tumor Volume Segmentation Using a Public Benchmark PET/CT Dataset

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method for automated segmentation of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans of patients with lymphoma, using an independent, publicly available benchmark dataset curated and segmented by expert readers in a previously published study. <b>Methods:</b> The AI model, based on a 3-dimensional U-Net architecture implemented in MONAI (the medical open-source network for AI framework), was trained on 1,500 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans of patients with lymphoma. It was tested on a benchmark dataset comprising 60 baseline scans (20 each of follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), each segmented by 3 or 4 nuclear medicine physicians using an SUV threshold of 4. Agreement between AI-derived and benchmark TMTVs was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, with acceptable deviation defined as within 10% or 10 cm<sup>3</sup>, consistent with interreader variability reported in the benchmark study. <b>Results:</b> In 50 (83%) of the 60 benchmark cases, AI-derived TMTVs were within 10% or 10 cm<sup>3</sup> of the benchmark reference. In 4 of the remaining 10 cases, AI-derived results were within the same margin of at least 1 of the expert readers, indicating partial concordance. <b>Conclusion:</b> The AI-based method achieved high concordance with expert-derived TMTVs in a standardized benchmark setting. The findings demonstrate that the AI model performs comparably to human experts in most cases, even in an externally curated dataset deliberately enriched with challenging cases by its original authors. The AI model's ability to produce accurate, reproducible segmentations without user interaction could significantly reduce manual workload and interreader variability in lymphoma imaging. However, human supervision is required to minimize errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271605
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of an AI Method for Automated Lymphoma Metabolic Tumor Volume Segmentation Using a Public Benchmark PET/CT Dataset

May Sadik, Måns Larsson, Lars Edenbrandt, Olof Enqvist
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Validation of an AI Method for Automated Lymphoma Metabolic Tumor Volume Segmentation Using a Public Benchmark PET/CT Dataset

May Sadik, Måns Larsson, Lars Edenbrandt, Olof Enqvist
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method for automated segmentation of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans of patients with lymphoma, using an independent, publicly available benchmark dataset curated and segmented by expert readers in a previously published study. <b>Methods:</b> The AI model, based on a 3-dimensional U-Net architecture implemented in MONAI (the medical open-source network for AI framework), was trained on 1,500 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans of patients with lymphoma. It was tested on a benchmark dataset comprising 60 baseline scans (20 each of follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), each segmented by 3 or 4 nuclear medicine physicians using an SUV threshold of 4. Agreement between AI-derived and benchmark TMTVs was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, with acceptable deviation defined as within 10% or 10 cm<sup>3</sup>, consistent with interreader variability reported in the benchmark study. <b>Results:</b> In 50 (83%) of the 60 benchmark cases, AI-derived TMTVs were within 10% or 10 cm<sup>3</sup> of the benchmark reference. In 4 of the remaining 10 cases, AI-derived results were within the same margin of at least 1 of the expert readers, indicating partial concordance. <b>Conclusion:</b> The AI-based method achieved high concordance with expert-derived TMTVs in a standardized benchmark setting. The findings demonstrate that the AI model performs comparably to human experts in most cases, even in an externally curated dataset deliberately enriched with challenging cases by its original authors. The AI model's ability to produce accurate, reproducible segmentations without user interaction could significantly reduce manual workload and interreader variability in lymphoma imaging. However, human supervision is required to minimize errors.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Lund University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Lipigon Pharmaceuticals (Sweden) (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.