Evaluation of the iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer in ex-vivo rabbit eyes

Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is fundamental for both clinical ophthalmology and experimental research. Study evaluated the performance of iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer in four enucleated rabbit eyes. We employed a stepwise pressure-increasing protocol to generate a physiologically relevant IOP range (5–55 mmHg). At each target pressure, measurements were taken concurrently with the tonometer (using the rabbit-specific mode) and the reference sensor. We used linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement across the entire dataset, supplemented by a segmented analysis of normal and elevated IOP ranges. Overall linear regression revealed a strong correlation between the iFalconTMV100 Vet and the reference sensor(R² = 0.9712, p < 0.001); however, interval-dependent bias was present. The positive intercept (0.8951) suggested a tendency for the tonometer to overestimate IOP at low measurement range, while slope < 1 suggested systematic underestimation at higher pressures. Bland-Altman analysis further confirmed this systematic underestimation bias at central corneal position. The iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer showed strong agreement with direct sensor measurements across a broad pressure range (5–55 mmHg) in an ex vivo rabbit model, supporting its potential utility for IOP assessment in this setting, with limitations noted in extreme pressure ranges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Veterinary Research
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05355-5
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer in ex-vivo rabbit eyes

Hao Chen, Ji Fu, Jiamin Jin, Yunhao Su
BMC Veterinary Research
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Evaluation of the iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer in ex-vivo rabbit eyes

Hao Chen, Ji Fu, Jiamin Jin, Yunhao Su
article en

Abstract

Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is fundamental for both clinical ophthalmology and experimental research. Study evaluated the performance of iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer in four enucleated rabbit eyes. We employed a stepwise pressure-increasing protocol to generate a physiologically relevant IOP range (5–55 mmHg). At each target pressure, measurements were taken concurrently with the tonometer (using the rabbit-specific mode) and the reference sensor. We used linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement across the entire dataset, supplemented by a segmented analysis of normal and elevated IOP ranges. Overall linear regression revealed a strong correlation between the iFalconTMV100 Vet and the reference sensor(R² = 0.9712, p < 0.001); however, interval-dependent bias was present. The positive intercept (0.8951) suggested a tendency for the tonometer to overestimate IOP at low measurement range, while slope < 1 suggested systematic underestimation at higher pressures. Bland-Altman analysis further confirmed this systematic underestimation bias at central corneal position. The iFalconTMV100 rebound tonometer showed strong agreement with direct sensor measurements across a broad pressure range (5–55 mmHg) in an ex vivo rabbit model, supporting its potential utility for IOP assessment in this setting, with limitations noted in extreme pressure ranges.

BMC Veterinary Research
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.