Diurnal and Phenological Modulation of Canopy Temperature in Wheat Breeding Under Mediterranean Conditions

Canopy temperature (CT) is widely used to assess crop water and heat status, but it is often recorded at a single hour, implicitly treating CT as a stable trait. Here, we show that canopy cooling is a dynamic phenotype whose expression depends on time of day, phenological stage, and environment. First, we monitored 184 spring wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) genotypes in two Mediterranean environments (fully irrigated vs. rainfed, contrasting atmospheric demand) using UAV-based thermal imaging. CT was measured six times per day (10:30-17:30 h) at four reproductive stages (anthesis, milk-grain, milk-dough, and dough), enabling quantification of diurnal plasticity, seasonal shifts, and environmental effects on canopy cooling. Second, repeated-measures mixed models confirmed that Location, Stage, and Time of day, and all interactions, were highly significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Variance-component analyses showed a strong genetic signal within each Stage × Environment combination, with 87.6-97.7% of total variance attributable to genotypic effects pooled across hours. Third, the optimal phenotyping window was context dependent: under rainfed conditions, genotypic discrimination consistently peaked around mid-afternoon (~15:00 h), whereas under irrigation, the optimal window shifted with stage (13:30-15:00 h). Genotype rankings were also markedly less stable across hours under rainfed conditions, indicating substantial within-day re-ranking as atmospheric demand increased. Finally, thermal exposure analyses showed that exceeding a physiologically relevant threshold (CT > 32 °C) depended strongly on time of day and stage; maximum CT captured short heat events missed by daily means. Clustering and alluvial analyses revealed frequent reclassification across stages, with only a small subset remaining consistently cooler, particularly under stress. Random regression of CT on vapor pressure deficit (VPD) indicated that CT-VPD sensitivity was largely environment-dependent and showed weak cross-environment correspondence (Spearman ρ = -0.166). Overall, single-time-point CT phenotyping provides an incomplete view of thermal status, underscoring the need for multi-temporal protocols and context-specific measurement windows for breeding and physiological interpretation under drought and heat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050797
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diurnal and Phenological Modulation of Canopy Temperature in Wheat Breeding Under Mediterranean Conditions

Felipe Moraga, Alejandro del Pozo, Ivan T. Matus, José Cares et al.
Plants
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
article

Diurnal and Phenological Modulation of Canopy Temperature in Wheat Breeding Under Mediterranean Conditions

Felipe Moraga, Alejandro del Pozo, Ivan T. Matus, José Cares, Gonzalo Ríos-Vásquez, Luis Inostroza, Gustavo A. Lobos, Carlos Araya-Riquelme, Josefa Pacheco, Manuel A. Bravo, Isadora Pérez, Jesús Flores-Olave, Hanns de la Fuente-Mella, Hamza-Ali Khan, Dalma Castillo
article en

Abstract

Canopy temperature (CT) is widely used to assess crop water and heat status, but it is often recorded at a single hour, implicitly treating CT as a stable trait. Here, we show that canopy cooling is a dynamic phenotype whose expression depends on time of day, phenological stage, and environment. First, we monitored 184 spring wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) genotypes in two Mediterranean environments (fully irrigated vs. rainfed, contrasting atmospheric demand) using UAV-based thermal imaging. CT was measured six times per day (10:30-17:30 h) at four reproductive stages (anthesis, milk-grain, milk-dough, and dough), enabling quantification of diurnal plasticity, seasonal shifts, and environmental effects on canopy cooling. Second, repeated-measures mixed models confirmed that Location, Stage, and Time of day, and all interactions, were highly significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Variance-component analyses showed a strong genetic signal within each Stage × Environment combination, with 87.6-97.7% of total variance attributable to genotypic effects pooled across hours. Third, the optimal phenotyping window was context dependent: under rainfed conditions, genotypic discrimination consistently peaked around mid-afternoon (~15:00 h), whereas under irrigation, the optimal window shifted with stage (13:30-15:00 h). Genotype rankings were also markedly less stable across hours under rainfed conditions, indicating substantial within-day re-ranking as atmospheric demand increased. Finally, thermal exposure analyses showed that exceeding a physiologically relevant threshold (CT > 32 °C) depended strongly on time of day and stage; maximum CT captured short heat events missed by daily means. Clustering and alluvial analyses revealed frequent reclassification across stages, with only a small subset remaining consistently cooler, particularly under stress. Random regression of CT on vapor pressure deficit (VPD) indicated that CT-VPD sensitivity was largely environment-dependent and showed weak cross-environment correspondence (Spearman ρ = -0.166). Overall, single-time-point CT phenotyping provides an incomplete view of thermal status, underscoring the need for multi-temporal protocols and context-specific measurement windows for breeding and physiological interpretation under drought and heat.

PlantsVol. 15(5)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), University of Talca (CL), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CL), Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso (CL)
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Agenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.