The politics of multispecies justice in practice? An analysis of the Grensmaas river restoration project in the Netherlands

The Grensmaas river restoration project at the border between the Netherlands and Belgium tries to combine flood control with economic profit and ‘nature development’. It involves various actors and has been publicly portrayed as a success story. Nevertheless, different points of contention, disagreement, and occasional convergence reveal the politics in practice of contested river territories like this. I approach the Grensmaas case through a political ecology perspective focused on multispecies justice, demonstrating that river restoration projects are always informed by power and politics that impact a multiplicity of human and non-human beings; and that these projects are fundamentally about which species matter, why, and for whom. I reflect on how river restoration narratives and practices may be transformed by engaging with the notion of MSJ, namely by challenging dominant frameworks of river management and governance to acknowledge and respond to the agency, needs, and interests of non-human beings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Politics
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2026.2633839
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of multispecies justice in practice? An analysis of the Grensmaas river restoration project in the Netherlands

Carlota Houart
Environmental Politics
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
article

The politics of multispecies justice in practice? An analysis of the Grensmaas river restoration project in the Netherlands

Carlota Houart
article en

Abstract

The Grensmaas river restoration project at the border between the Netherlands and Belgium tries to combine flood control with economic profit and ‘nature development’. It involves various actors and has been publicly portrayed as a success story. Nevertheless, different points of contention, disagreement, and occasional convergence reveal the politics in practice of contested river territories like this. I approach the Grensmaas case through a political ecology perspective focused on multispecies justice, demonstrating that river restoration projects are always informed by power and politics that impact a multiplicity of human and non-human beings; and that these projects are fundamentally about which species matter, why, and for whom. I reflect on how river restoration narratives and practices may be transformed by engaging with the notion of MSJ, namely by challenging dominant frameworks of river management and governance to acknowledge and respond to the agency, needs, and interests of non-human beings.

Environmental Politics
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The politics of multispecies justice in practice? An analysis of the Grensmaas river restoration project in the Netherlands — Carlota Houart · Environmental Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS