Physics-guided neural network framework for surface roughness prediction in additively manufactured metallic alloys

Surface roughness (Ra) significantly influences fatigue performance, corrosion behavior, and postprocessing requirements in additively manufactured metallic components. In practice, Ra optimization remains dependent on alloy-specific experimental campaigns, limiting scalability and slowing process qualification. To address this challenge, this study develops a physics-guided neural modeling framework for trend-level Ra prediction using physically motivated energy descriptors and data-efficient learning strategies. The approach integrates heat input, energy density, and normalized energy as physics-derived features, together with surrogate-assisted training designed to interpolate experimentally and literature-supported behavior within validated process windows. Separate neural networks were trained for 316L stainless steel, Ti-6Al-4V, and AlSi10Mg using an identical architecture, feature set, and hybrid data–physics loss formulation. The contribution lies in the engineering integration of physics-guided feature construction, controlled surrogate interpolation, and alloy-specific model training within a unified methodological workflow, rather than in proposing a new neural architecture or enforcing governing equations. Despite limited experimental datasets (75 samples for 316L and approximately 20 literature-derived samples per alloy), the framework demonstrates strong cross-validated trend consistency (R2 ≈ 0.98–0.995) under fivefold evaluation. Residual analysis and response-surface visualizations confirm stable and physically plausible behavior. The reported R2 values reflect agreement in dominant process–roughness trends rather than deterministic predictive certainty. Overall, the results indicate that a consistent physics-guided modeling strategy can support interpretable and data-efficient surface roughness prediction within experimentally qualified domains. The framework provides a foundation for extending physics-guided learning to related additive manufacturing quality metrics while remaining confined to validated operating windows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laser Applications
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2351/7.0002049
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-guided neural network framework for surface roughness prediction in additively manufactured metallic alloys

Aswin Karkadakattil
Journal of Laser Applications
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Physics-guided neural network framework for surface roughness prediction in additively manufactured metallic alloys

Aswin Karkadakattil
article en

Abstract

Surface roughness (Ra) significantly influences fatigue performance, corrosion behavior, and postprocessing requirements in additively manufactured metallic components. In practice, Ra optimization remains dependent on alloy-specific experimental campaigns, limiting scalability and slowing process qualification. To address this challenge, this study develops a physics-guided neural modeling framework for trend-level Ra prediction using physically motivated energy descriptors and data-efficient learning strategies. The approach integrates heat input, energy density, and normalized energy as physics-derived features, together with surrogate-assisted training designed to interpolate experimentally and literature-supported behavior within validated process windows. Separate neural networks were trained for 316L stainless steel, Ti-6Al-4V, and AlSi10Mg using an identical architecture, feature set, and hybrid data–physics loss formulation. The contribution lies in the engineering integration of physics-guided feature construction, controlled surrogate interpolation, and alloy-specific model training within a unified methodological workflow, rather than in proposing a new neural architecture or enforcing governing equations. Despite limited experimental datasets (75 samples for 316L and approximately 20 literature-derived samples per alloy), the framework demonstrates strong cross-validated trend consistency (R2 ≈ 0.98–0.995) under fivefold evaluation. Residual analysis and response-surface visualizations confirm stable and physically plausible behavior. The reported R2 values reflect agreement in dominant process–roughness trends rather than deterministic predictive certainty. Overall, the results indicate that a consistent physics-guided modeling strategy can support interpretable and data-efficient surface roughness prediction within experimentally qualified domains. The framework provides a foundation for extending physics-guided learning to related additive manufacturing quality metrics while remaining confined to validated operating windows.

Journal of Laser ApplicationsVol. 38(2)
Central University of Kerala (IN), Institute of Applied Dermatology (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.