Teachers’ E-Assessment Competences and Practices in the Context of the Digitalization of Secondary Education

E-assessment is a key component of contemporary teaching and learning. This study examines teachers’ e-assessment competences and practices in Bulgarian secondary education. It applies an embedded mixed-methods design combining quantitative self-assessment data from adapted Bulgarian versions of SELFIE for Teachers and SELFIE for Schools tools together with qualitative evidence from semi-structured interviews. Using a nationally representative selection of 30 schools, quantitative data was collected from 574 teachers related to their e-assessment competences and from 655 teachers on institutional e-assessment practices, which was complemented by interviews with 220 teachers. Teachers’ self-assessed competences were found to be largely at the lower levels of awareness and limited implementation, rather than systematic use, with few teachers reporting advanced competence. Although institutional support for e-assessment is perceived as strong, this is not reflected in pedagogic practice. The interview data shows teachers’ conceptual ambiguities, with formative e-assessment implemented in fragmented ways and rarely explicitly recognised. Innovative approaches, such as peer assessment, self-assessment, and the systematic use of digital evidence to inform instruction, are rarely used. The study reveals a misalignment between teachers’ perceived competences, institutional conditions, and actual practice, highlighting the need for targeted professional development and clearer conceptual framing to support the meaningful integration of e-assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030397
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ E-Assessment Competences and Practices in the Context of the Digitalization of Secondary Education

Bistra Mizova, Vasia Delibaltova, Roumiana Peytcheva-Forsyth
Education Sciences
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Teachers’ E-Assessment Competences and Practices in the Context of the Digitalization of Secondary Education

Bistra Mizova, Vasia Delibaltova, Roumiana Peytcheva-Forsyth
article en

Abstract

E-assessment is a key component of contemporary teaching and learning. This study examines teachers’ e-assessment competences and practices in Bulgarian secondary education. It applies an embedded mixed-methods design combining quantitative self-assessment data from adapted Bulgarian versions of SELFIE for Teachers and SELFIE for Schools tools together with qualitative evidence from semi-structured interviews. Using a nationally representative selection of 30 schools, quantitative data was collected from 574 teachers related to their e-assessment competences and from 655 teachers on institutional e-assessment practices, which was complemented by interviews with 220 teachers. Teachers’ self-assessed competences were found to be largely at the lower levels of awareness and limited implementation, rather than systematic use, with few teachers reporting advanced competence. Although institutional support for e-assessment is perceived as strong, this is not reflected in pedagogic practice. The interview data shows teachers’ conceptual ambiguities, with formative e-assessment implemented in fragmented ways and rarely explicitly recognised. Innovative approaches, such as peer assessment, self-assessment, and the systematic use of digital evidence to inform instruction, are rarely used. The study reveals a misalignment between teachers’ perceived competences, institutional conditions, and actual practice, highlighting the need for targeted professional development and clearer conceptual framing to support the meaningful integration of e-assessment.

Education SciencesVol. 16(3)
Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" (BG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.