Autonomous Event Driven Multi Agent Orchestration for Enterprise AI at Scale

Enterprise AI aims to move toward continuous event monitoring, detection, and action across specialist agents, yet existing multi-agent systems largely assume discrete request-response workflows and remain underexplored at enterprise scale. We evaluate DAG Plan & Execute and ReAct across 208 production-derived enterprise scenarios spanning Persona (<10 agents), Department (20–80), and Enterprise (200) scales, and introduce a Task Manager for continuous operation via priority inference, related-event merging, and preemption. Results show that scale, not task complexity, dominates orchestration performance: both architectures perform well at small scale but degrade at enterprise scale as agent discovery noise becomes the primary bottleneck, with simple tasks degrading more sharply than complex ones. DAG Plan & Execute offers higher precision and structured parallelization at smaller scales, but its higher overhead worsens at enterprise scale. ReAct is more robust by handling failures incrementally. The Task Manager reduces high-priority queue latency by 14–75% and improves related-event correctness by over 20 percentage points at enterprise scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18873316
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Autonomous Event Driven Multi Agent Orchestration for Enterprise AI at Scale

Aaron Travis Lee, Harsh Rao Dhanyamraju, Leonidas Raghav
Open MIND
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
preprint

Autonomous Event Driven Multi Agent Orchestration for Enterprise AI at Scale

Aaron Travis Lee, Harsh Rao Dhanyamraju, Leonidas Raghav
preprint en

Abstract

Enterprise AI aims to move toward continuous event monitoring, detection, and action across specialist agents, yet existing multi-agent systems largely assume discrete request-response workflows and remain underexplored at enterprise scale. We evaluate DAG Plan & Execute and ReAct across 208 production-derived enterprise scenarios spanning Persona (<10 agents), Department (20–80), and Enterprise (200) scales, and introduce a Task Manager for continuous operation via priority inference, related-event merging, and preemption. Results show that scale, not task complexity, dominates orchestration performance: both architectures perform well at small scale but degrade at enterprise scale as agent discovery noise becomes the primary bottleneck, with simple tasks degrading more sharply than complex ones. DAG Plan & Execute offers higher precision and structured parallelization at smaller scales, but its higher overhead worsens at enterprise scale. ReAct is more robust by handling failures incrementally. The Task Manager reduces high-priority queue latency by 14–75% and improves related-event correctness by over 20 percentage points at enterprise scale.

Open MIND
Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (United States) (US), Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Germany) (DE), Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (United Kingdom) (GB)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.