Analogies as an overlooked tool for fostering students’ higher-order thinking: insights from graduate teaching assistant training

Teaching higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is an explicit but elusive goal of universities. Reviews of instructional strategies for promoting HOTS do not include the use of analogies; however, in our introductory pedagogy courses, we found 58% of participants designed HOTS-focused assessments of student learning after a module on systematic teaching with analogies, a far better result than found in many analyses of university and professional exams. In this paper, we present a dual contribution: first, we highlight analogies as an overlooked but powerful strategy for fostering HOTS in university instruction. Second, we examine the structured tool that facilitated this result and argue that recipe-like tools, while sometimes critiqued as restrictive, can in fact scaffold complex instructions, design out common pitfalls, and provide instructors with a clear pathway to apply new ways of teaching; they warrant greater consideration in academic development practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal for Academic Development
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2026.2633996
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analogies as an overlooked tool for fostering students’ higher-order thinking: insights from graduate teaching assistant training

Kai Niebert, Sara Petchey, Karin Brown
The International Journal for Academic Development
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Analogies as an overlooked tool for fostering students’ higher-order thinking: insights from graduate teaching assistant training

Kai Niebert, Sara Petchey, Karin Brown
article en

Abstract

Teaching higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is an explicit but elusive goal of universities. Reviews of instructional strategies for promoting HOTS do not include the use of analogies; however, in our introductory pedagogy courses, we found 58% of participants designed HOTS-focused assessments of student learning after a module on systematic teaching with analogies, a far better result than found in many analyses of university and professional exams. In this paper, we present a dual contribution: first, we highlight analogies as an overlooked but powerful strategy for fostering HOTS in university instruction. Second, we examine the structured tool that facilitated this result and argue that recipe-like tools, while sometimes critiqued as restrictive, can in fact scaffold complex instructions, design out common pitfalls, and provide instructors with a clear pathway to apply new ways of teaching; they warrant greater consideration in academic development practice.

The International Journal for Academic Development
University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analogies as an overlooked tool for fostering students’ higher-order thinking: insights from graduate teaching assistant training — Kai Niebert, Sara Petchey, et al. · The International Journal for Academic Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS