Critical risk identification in construction projects using 2D and 3D risk matrices

Construction projects are exposed to numerous risks that may adversely affect project cost and duration. The purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize key construction risks by combining a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) with a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) and analyzing these risks using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) risk matrices. In total, 63 risk factors were identified and categorized into five main areas of the work breakdown structure: earthwork, concrete, finishing, mechanical, and electrical. The questionnaire was designed based on each risk category and then sent to engineers, who were asked to estimate the risk probability and its impact. In total, 378 engineers responded. The respondents data were analyzed by using the risk matrix method. Two separate 3D risk matrices were made: one was based on multiplying all three data points, and the other was based on combining both impacts. The results clearly show that the 3D matrix, which combines cost and time impact, yields more accurate results than the matrix that multiplies cost impact and time impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344476
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical risk identification in construction projects using 2D and 3D risk matrices

A. Öztas, Dalshad Kakasor Ismael Jaff, Shamal Ali Othman
PLoS ONE
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Critical risk identification in construction projects using 2D and 3D risk matrices

A. Öztas, Dalshad Kakasor Ismael Jaff, Shamal Ali Othman
article en

Abstract

Construction projects are exposed to numerous risks that may adversely affect project cost and duration. The purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize key construction risks by combining a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) with a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) and analyzing these risks using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) risk matrices. In total, 63 risk factors were identified and categorized into five main areas of the work breakdown structure: earthwork, concrete, finishing, mechanical, and electrical. The questionnaire was designed based on each risk category and then sent to engineers, who were asked to estimate the risk probability and its impact. In total, 378 engineers responded. The respondents data were analyzed by using the risk matrix method. Two separate 3D risk matrices were made: one was based on multiplying all three data points, and the other was based on combining both impacts. The results clearly show that the 3D matrix, which combines cost and time impact, yields more accurate results than the matrix that multiplies cost impact and time impact.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
Salahaddin University-Erbil (IQ), Epoka University (AL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical risk identification in construction projects using 2D and 3D risk matrices — A. Öztas, Dalshad Kakasor Ismael Jaff, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS