Methodological Approaches to Sleep Measures in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder – A Systematic Review

Given the prevalence and significance of sleep difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), several interventional studies using diverse sleep measurement tools have recently emerged. This systematic review assesses the methodology quality of frequently used sleep measurement tools in interventional RCT studies involving children with ASD, and it recommends a methodological approach to evaluating sleep outcomes. This review process followed PRISMA guidelines. All 39 identified interventional RCTs involved children with ASD (<18 years old), of which they were of low (n = 2, 5%), moderate (n = 13, 33%), and high (n = 24, 62%) quality. The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ, n = 22), actigraphy (ACT, n = 12), and the Sleep and Nap Diaries (SNDs, n = 11) were the most frequently used sleep measurement tools. Most studies (n=28, 72%) chose single and or subjective sleep measurement tools, and their methodologies generally had moderate to high compliance with reporting criteria: none employed polysomnography (PSG). This review revealed that the quality of interventional RCT studies within the population was generally optimal; however, using single and subjective sleep measurement tools was a notable limitation. Future research that combines PSG, ACT, sleep questionnaires such as CSHQ, and SNDs is recommended as a robust methodological approach to evaluating sleep outcomes in children with ASD during interventional RCT studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Sleep Medicine Reports
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40675-026-00354-2
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Approaches to Sleep Measures in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder – A Systematic Review

Shauna Fjaagesund, Uchenna Ezedinma, Florin Oprescu, Evan Jones et al.
Current Sleep Medicine Reports
Sleep and related disorders
article

Methodological Approaches to Sleep Measures in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder – A Systematic Review

Shauna Fjaagesund, Uchenna Ezedinma, Florin Oprescu, Evan Jones, Terri Downer, Scott Burgess, Alexandra Metse
article en

Abstract

Given the prevalence and significance of sleep difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), several interventional studies using diverse sleep measurement tools have recently emerged. This systematic review assesses the methodology quality of frequently used sleep measurement tools in interventional RCT studies involving children with ASD, and it recommends a methodological approach to evaluating sleep outcomes. This review process followed PRISMA guidelines. All 39 identified interventional RCTs involved children with ASD (<18 years old), of which they were of low (n = 2, 5%), moderate (n = 13, 33%), and high (n = 24, 62%) quality. The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ, n = 22), actigraphy (ACT, n = 12), and the Sleep and Nap Diaries (SNDs, n = 11) were the most frequently used sleep measurement tools. Most studies (n=28, 72%) chose single and or subjective sleep measurement tools, and their methodologies generally had moderate to high compliance with reporting criteria: none employed polysomnography (PSG). This review revealed that the quality of interventional RCT studies within the population was generally optimal; however, using single and subjective sleep measurement tools was a notable limitation. Future research that combines PSG, ACT, sleep questionnaires such as CSHQ, and SNDs is recommended as a robust methodological approach to evaluating sleep outcomes in children with ASD during interventional RCT studies.

Current Sleep Medicine ReportsVol. 12(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.