How to Measure Public Support for Political Violence

Abstract With low but rising levels of violent political threats and violent acts by civilians in the United States, researchers increasingly want to measure violent public views—fearing the erosion of collective norms inhibiting violence while also regarding individual attitudes as a risk for rare violent action and more common forms of aggressive political behavior. But how should violent views be measured and interpreted? Drawing on our decade-plus researching these views with several dozen questions and a catalogue of related work by others, we provide a practical measurement guide for assessing violent political views with extensive new observational and experimental illustrations that also make important methodological and substantive contributions to the field. We provide considerations for choosing good measure(s): empirically informed measurement principles, general and specific question evaluations, a deep dive into question design, reliability, and validity, and more. The Supplementary Material also catalogues a century of violence questions and more published works.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Opinion Quarterly
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf069
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Measure Public Support for Political Violence

Lilliana Mason, Nathan P. Kalmoe
Public Opinion Quarterly
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

How to Measure Public Support for Political Violence

Lilliana Mason, Nathan P. Kalmoe
article en

Abstract

Abstract With low but rising levels of violent political threats and violent acts by civilians in the United States, researchers increasingly want to measure violent public views—fearing the erosion of collective norms inhibiting violence while also regarding individual attitudes as a risk for rare violent action and more common forms of aggressive political behavior. But how should violent views be measured and interpreted? Drawing on our decade-plus researching these views with several dozen questions and a catalogue of related work by others, we provide a practical measurement guide for assessing violent political views with extensive new observational and experimental illustrations that also make important methodological and substantive contributions to the field. We provide considerations for choosing good measure(s): empirically informed measurement principles, general and specific question evaluations, a deep dive into question design, reliability, and validity, and more. The Supplementary Material also catalogues a century of violence questions and more published works.

Public Opinion Quarterly
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.