Triple Bottom Line in Universities: Outcomes and Factors Driving Sustainability

Despite the growing prominence of the triple bottom line (TBL) framework in university sustainability discourse, empirical research examining how environmental, social, and economic outcomes are realized across diverse national contexts within higher education institutions remains limited. This qualitative study explored how 12 STARS-rated universities from both Anglo-American and Emerging regions have achieved TBL outcomes and the institutional and contextual factors that influence them. In-depth interviews with sustainability coordinators revealed that environmental outcomes, such as zero-waste goals and carbon neutrality, were well developed; social outcomes, such as student engagement, SDG-aligned curricula, and gender equity, showed emerging integration; and economic outcomes, such as sustainable procurement and green budgeting, remained less defined. The findings also showed that internal drivers, such as governance arrangements, capacity, culture, and external drivers, such as rankings, funding availability, and national policies, shaped the scope and success of initiatives. These findings highlight that TBL implementation in universities is an uneven, contextually mediated process and provide insights for higher education leaders seeking to strengthen institutional strategies for sustainability transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030400
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triple Bottom Line in Universities: Outcomes and Factors Driving Sustainability

Pwint Nee Aung, Philip Hallinger
Education Sciences
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Triple Bottom Line in Universities: Outcomes and Factors Driving Sustainability

Pwint Nee Aung, Philip Hallinger
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing prominence of the triple bottom line (TBL) framework in university sustainability discourse, empirical research examining how environmental, social, and economic outcomes are realized across diverse national contexts within higher education institutions remains limited. This qualitative study explored how 12 STARS-rated universities from both Anglo-American and Emerging regions have achieved TBL outcomes and the institutional and contextual factors that influence them. In-depth interviews with sustainability coordinators revealed that environmental outcomes, such as zero-waste goals and carbon neutrality, were well developed; social outcomes, such as student engagement, SDG-aligned curricula, and gender equity, showed emerging integration; and economic outcomes, such as sustainable procurement and green budgeting, remained less defined. The findings also showed that internal drivers, such as governance arrangements, capacity, culture, and external drivers, such as rankings, funding availability, and national policies, shaped the scope and success of initiatives. These findings highlight that TBL implementation in universities is an uneven, contextually mediated process and provide insights for higher education leaders seeking to strengthen institutional strategies for sustainability transformation.

Education SciencesVol. 16(3)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Mahidol University (TH), University of Medicine 2 Yangon (MM), University Of Medicine 1 Yangon (MM)
Mahidol University
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.