Differences Between Oral Neutrophils and Neutrophils Isolated From the Blood of Healthy Donors

The morphological and viscoelastic properties of blood neutrophils and neutrophils isolated from the oral cavity of the same donor were compared using scanning ion conductance microscopy. It was found that cell morphology, including morphometric parameters (height, diameter, and cell volume), did not differ significantly. However, the elasticity of the membrane-cytoskeletal complex was primarily determined by the cell compartment and its functional state (e.g., migration or adhesion) rather than the neutrophils' ecological niche (blood or oral cavity). The ability of blood neutrophils and oral neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) was assessed using luminol-dependent chemiluminescence. Neutrophils isolated from the oral cavity demonstrated a significantly higher ROS-producing activity compared to blood neutrophils from the same donor. Additionally, oral neutrophils exhibited high variability in ROS production levels, even within the same donor on different days of collection. When comparing the stimulation of ROS production in blood and oral neutrophils exposed to S. aureus 2879M, the cells displayed opposing responses: blood neutrophils were stimulated by Staphylococci, whereas oral neutrophils were inhibited. This response persisted when cells were stimulated by Staphylococci preincubated with saliva. The sequential addition of unfiltered saliva to neutrophils and Staphylococci enhanced this trend, while filtered oral fluid attenuated it. For the first time, it was established that saliva without bacteria (filtered through bacterial filters) suppresses the production of ROS by both blood neutrophils and oral neutrophils, most likely indicating an anti-inflammatory effect of saliva.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Oral Microbiology
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/omi.70025
Primary Topic
Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences Between Oral Neutrophils and Neutrophils Isolated From the Blood of Healthy Donors

С. Н. Плескова, N. A. Bezrukov, Ekaterina D. Nikolaeva, Yulia A Zamazkina
Molecular Oral Microbiology
Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
article

Differences Between Oral Neutrophils and Neutrophils Isolated From the Blood of Healthy Donors

С. Н. Плескова, N. A. Bezrukov, Ekaterina D. Nikolaeva, Yulia A Zamazkina
article en

Abstract

The morphological and viscoelastic properties of blood neutrophils and neutrophils isolated from the oral cavity of the same donor were compared using scanning ion conductance microscopy. It was found that cell morphology, including morphometric parameters (height, diameter, and cell volume), did not differ significantly. However, the elasticity of the membrane-cytoskeletal complex was primarily determined by the cell compartment and its functional state (e.g., migration or adhesion) rather than the neutrophils' ecological niche (blood or oral cavity). The ability of blood neutrophils and oral neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) was assessed using luminol-dependent chemiluminescence. Neutrophils isolated from the oral cavity demonstrated a significantly higher ROS-producing activity compared to blood neutrophils from the same donor. Additionally, oral neutrophils exhibited high variability in ROS production levels, even within the same donor on different days of collection. When comparing the stimulation of ROS production in blood and oral neutrophils exposed to S. aureus 2879M, the cells displayed opposing responses: blood neutrophils were stimulated by Staphylococci, whereas oral neutrophils were inhibited. This response persisted when cells were stimulated by Staphylococci preincubated with saliva. The sequential addition of unfiltered saliva to neutrophils and Staphylococci enhanced this trend, while filtered oral fluid attenuated it. For the first time, it was established that saliva without bacteria (filtered through bacterial filters) suppresses the production of ROS by both blood neutrophils and oral neutrophils, most likely indicating an anti-inflammatory effect of saliva.

Molecular Oral Microbiology
Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University (RU), Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University (RU), N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.