Using the InVEST-PLUS-GeoDetector Model to Predict and Analyze the Pattern of Ecosystem Carbon Storage in the Dongting Lake Basin, China

Guaranteeing the ecological security of the Dongting Lake Basin is of paramount importance for national-scale programs, such as the Yangtze River Economic Belt and aquatic conservation projects. Within this framework, carbon storage and its determining drivers act as essential indicators of regional ecological stability. However, the historical trajectory of carbon pools and their response to future multi-scenario land-use transitions remain insufficiently understood. Therefore, this study aims to quantify the spatiotemporal evolution of carbon storage in the Dongting Lake Basin from 2000 to 2020 and project its future dynamics under diverse development pathways. This study, utilizing land use data from 2000 to 2020 and the carbon density database of the Dongting Lake Basin, assessed land use changes over two decades and determined the spatiotemporal distribution of carbon storage. Additionally, using 17 driving factors and various spatial policies, the study projected the land use and land cover changes (LUCC) for 2030 under four scenarios: natural development, ecological protection, economic development, and planned development. The spatiotemporal distribution of carbon storage and its response mechanisms were analyzed for each scenario. The results showed that carbon storage was directly impacted by LUCC, with an overall “decrease-increase-decrease” trend from 2000 to 2020, resulting in a net increase of 3.685 × 106 t. By 2030, the changes in carbon storage under the natural development, ecological protection scenario, economic development, and planned development scenarios were projected to be −1.008 × 107 t, 1.276 × 107 t, 3.292 × 108 t, and −1.200 × 105 t, respectively. Notably, the ecological protection scenario showed a significant positive growth in carbon storage, primarily driven by an increase in forest and wetland areas. Additionally, the spatial distribution of carbon storage exhibited a pattern of “high in the west and low in the east”. These results imply that to achieve the “Dual Carbon Strategy”, future land use planning in the Dongting Lake Basin should prioritize ecological protection and planned development models, including strict control of construction land expansion, increasing ecological land area, and enhancing carbon storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052543
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the InVEST-PLUS-GeoDetector Model to Predict and Analyze the Pattern of Ecosystem Carbon Storage in the Dongting Lake Basin, China

Jianjun Li, Cui Zhou, Falin Liu, Qi Liu et al.
Sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Using the InVEST-PLUS-GeoDetector Model to Predict and Analyze the Pattern of Ecosystem Carbon Storage in the Dongting Lake Basin, China

Jianjun Li, Cui Zhou, Falin Liu, Qi Liu, Huan Xia, Jing Zhou
article en

Abstract

Guaranteeing the ecological security of the Dongting Lake Basin is of paramount importance for national-scale programs, such as the Yangtze River Economic Belt and aquatic conservation projects. Within this framework, carbon storage and its determining drivers act as essential indicators of regional ecological stability. However, the historical trajectory of carbon pools and their response to future multi-scenario land-use transitions remain insufficiently understood. Therefore, this study aims to quantify the spatiotemporal evolution of carbon storage in the Dongting Lake Basin from 2000 to 2020 and project its future dynamics under diverse development pathways. This study, utilizing land use data from 2000 to 2020 and the carbon density database of the Dongting Lake Basin, assessed land use changes over two decades and determined the spatiotemporal distribution of carbon storage. Additionally, using 17 driving factors and various spatial policies, the study projected the land use and land cover changes (LUCC) for 2030 under four scenarios: natural development, ecological protection, economic development, and planned development. The spatiotemporal distribution of carbon storage and its response mechanisms were analyzed for each scenario. The results showed that carbon storage was directly impacted by LUCC, with an overall “decrease-increase-decrease” trend from 2000 to 2020, resulting in a net increase of 3.685 × 106 t. By 2030, the changes in carbon storage under the natural development, ecological protection scenario, economic development, and planned development scenarios were projected to be −1.008 × 107 t, 1.276 × 107 t, 3.292 × 108 t, and −1.200 × 105 t, respectively. Notably, the ecological protection scenario showed a significant positive growth in carbon storage, primarily driven by an increase in forest and wetland areas. Additionally, the spatial distribution of carbon storage exhibited a pattern of “high in the west and low in the east”. These results imply that to achieve the “Dual Carbon Strategy”, future land use planning in the Dongting Lake Basin should prioritize ecological protection and planned development models, including strict control of construction land expansion, increasing ecological land area, and enhancing carbon storage.

SustainabilityVol. 18(5)
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Central South University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.