Osseous Engagement of Sacropelvic Porous Fusion–Fixation Screws

(1) Background and introduction: High-demand lumbosacral fusions are often supplemented with sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws. The idealized SAI trajectory was estimated to traverse 35 mm of sacrum before crossing the sacroiliac (SI) joint. However, there is debate on how much osseous purchase SAI screws achieve. The goal of this study was to determine the amount of osseous engagement achieved using a porous fusion–fixation screw (PFFS) when placed in a stacked SAI configuration. (2) Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 40 consecutive patients who underwent sacropelvic fixation with stacked PFFS at our institution from 1 June 2022 to 30 June 2023, using intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-based computer navigation. A snapshot of each screw was taken and the length of purchase within the sacrum and ilium was measured on the axial image along the anterior and posterior aspect of each screw. Nineteen patients did not have adequate images available for review and were excluded. (3) Results: The overall mean anterior sacral engagement was 38.6 mm (±8.2 mm), which was found to be statistically significantly greater than the hypothesized threshold of 35 mm (p < 0.001), while posterior sacral engagement was 28.1 mm (±8.6 mm), which was not found to be statistically significantly greater than the hypothesized threshold of 35 mm (p = 1). The mean difference in sacral engagement between the anatomical location for the cephalad screws was 10.3 mm (p < 0.001) and 10.6 mm (p < 0.001) for the caudal screws. The total sacral surface area available for bone ingrowth for bilateral stacked PFFS was calculated to be 3338.3 mm2, while the total iliac surface area available for bone ingrowth was 4364.8 mm2. A mean difference in surface area availability between anatomical locations was −689.5 mm2 (p < 0.001) for the sacrum and 689.5 mm2 (p < 0.001) for the ilium. (4) Discussion and conclusions: The SAI trajectory screws in this cohort of patients achieved approximately 39 mm of sacrum engagement anteriorly and 28 mm posteriorly. This is consistent with prior estimates based on the idealized SAI pathway through the sacrum. PFFSs allow for simultaneous sacropelvic fixation and SI joint fusion, which may reduce the incidence of de novo SI joint pain in patients with long fusion constructs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Techniques Development
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/std15010011
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Osseous Engagement of Sacropelvic Porous Fusion–Fixation Screws

Jonathan N. Sembrano, Nathan R. Hendrickson, Kristen E. Jones, Todd J. Pottinger et al.
Surgical Techniques Development
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Osseous Engagement of Sacropelvic Porous Fusion–Fixation Screws

Jonathan N. Sembrano, Nathan R. Hendrickson, Kristen E. Jones, Todd J. Pottinger, Jason J. Haselhuhn, David W. Polly, Kari Odland, Christopher T. Martin
article en

Abstract

(1) Background and introduction: High-demand lumbosacral fusions are often supplemented with sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws. The idealized SAI trajectory was estimated to traverse 35 mm of sacrum before crossing the sacroiliac (SI) joint. However, there is debate on how much osseous purchase SAI screws achieve. The goal of this study was to determine the amount of osseous engagement achieved using a porous fusion–fixation screw (PFFS) when placed in a stacked SAI configuration. (2) Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 40 consecutive patients who underwent sacropelvic fixation with stacked PFFS at our institution from 1 June 2022 to 30 June 2023, using intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-based computer navigation. A snapshot of each screw was taken and the length of purchase within the sacrum and ilium was measured on the axial image along the anterior and posterior aspect of each screw. Nineteen patients did not have adequate images available for review and were excluded. (3) Results: The overall mean anterior sacral engagement was 38.6 mm (±8.2 mm), which was found to be statistically significantly greater than the hypothesized threshold of 35 mm (p < 0.001), while posterior sacral engagement was 28.1 mm (±8.6 mm), which was not found to be statistically significantly greater than the hypothesized threshold of 35 mm (p = 1). The mean difference in sacral engagement between the anatomical location for the cephalad screws was 10.3 mm (p < 0.001) and 10.6 mm (p < 0.001) for the caudal screws. The total sacral surface area available for bone ingrowth for bilateral stacked PFFS was calculated to be 3338.3 mm2, while the total iliac surface area available for bone ingrowth was 4364.8 mm2. A mean difference in surface area availability between anatomical locations was −689.5 mm2 (p < 0.001) for the sacrum and 689.5 mm2 (p < 0.001) for the ilium. (4) Discussion and conclusions: The SAI trajectory screws in this cohort of patients achieved approximately 39 mm of sacrum engagement anteriorly and 28 mm posteriorly. This is consistent with prior estimates based on the idealized SAI pathway through the sacrum. PFFSs allow for simultaneous sacropelvic fixation and SI joint fusion, which may reduce the incidence of de novo SI joint pain in patients with long fusion constructs.

Surgical Techniques DevelopmentVol. 15(1)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.