Impact of a participatory research intervention based on a citizen science approach on snacking consumption in European adolescents from deprived areas: a cluster randomised control trial of the SEEDS project

Improving adolescent diets requires promising interventions, best developed through participatory research like Citizen Science (CS). The present study aimed to assess the impact of a CS intervention on the consumption of healthy and unhealthy snacking choices for adolescents living in deprived areas and the influence of gender, age, and socioeconomic status (SES) in snacking behaviour. SEEDS is a cluster-randomised controlled trial (c-RCT) in four European countries, with 26 high schools randomized to intervention (IG) or control (CG) groups. The analysis included 1,208 adolescents aged 13–15 (IG = 589, CG = 619). Adolescents from IG in each country co-created a 6-month intervention on healthy snacking and physical activity. Snack consumption was the main outcome, assessed via the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children questionnaire. General Linear Models analysed intervention impact and the influence of gender, sex, and SES. IG adolescents showed higher odds than CG of daily fruit consumption [OR (95% CI) = 1.44 (0.03–2.02)], daily water consumption [OR (95% CI) = 1.89 (1.30 -2.77)] during school, and daily vegetable consumption [OR (95% CI) = 1.36 (1.01–1.82)] outside school hours. IG adolescents showed a higher odds of occasional cake/biscuits consumption [OR (95 CI) = 1.55 (1.14–2.13); OR (95% CI) = 1.82 (1.39–2.39)] and occasional juices/smoothies’ consumption [OR (95 CI) = 1.57 (1.15–2.16); OR (95% CI) = 1.33 (1.03–1.71)] than CG during and outside school. No effects were found for other snacks. A CS intervention, co-created by adolescents, improved snacking in and out of school, though promoting healthy snacking remains challenging and should be a focus for future efforts. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05002049 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05002049?cond=NCT05002049&rank=1); Date of registration: July 15, 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26877-5
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a participatory research intervention based on a citizen science approach on snacking consumption in European adolescents from deprived areas: a cluster randomised control trial of the SEEDS project

Wilma Jansen, Lucía Tarro, Judit Queral, Elisabet Llauradó et al.
BMC Public Health
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Impact of a participatory research intervention based on a citizen science approach on snacking consumption in European adolescents from deprived areas: a cluster randomised control trial of the SEEDS project

Wilma Jansen, Lucía Tarro, Judit Queral, Elisabet Llauradó, Dimitris Vlachopoulos, Craig A. Williams, Yannis Manios, Rosa Solà, Christina Mavrogianni, Famke J. M. Mölenberg
article en

Abstract

Improving adolescent diets requires promising interventions, best developed through participatory research like Citizen Science (CS). The present study aimed to assess the impact of a CS intervention on the consumption of healthy and unhealthy snacking choices for adolescents living in deprived areas and the influence of gender, age, and socioeconomic status (SES) in snacking behaviour. SEEDS is a cluster-randomised controlled trial (c-RCT) in four European countries, with 26 high schools randomized to intervention (IG) or control (CG) groups. The analysis included 1,208 adolescents aged 13–15 (IG = 589, CG = 619). Adolescents from IG in each country co-created a 6-month intervention on healthy snacking and physical activity. Snack consumption was the main outcome, assessed via the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children questionnaire. General Linear Models analysed intervention impact and the influence of gender, sex, and SES. IG adolescents showed higher odds than CG of daily fruit consumption [OR (95% CI) = 1.44 (0.03–2.02)], daily water consumption [OR (95% CI) = 1.89 (1.30 -2.77)] during school, and daily vegetable consumption [OR (95% CI) = 1.36 (1.01–1.82)] outside school hours. IG adolescents showed a higher odds of occasional cake/biscuits consumption [OR (95 CI) = 1.55 (1.14–2.13); OR (95% CI) = 1.82 (1.39–2.39)] and occasional juices/smoothies’ consumption [OR (95 CI) = 1.57 (1.15–2.16); OR (95% CI) = 1.33 (1.03–1.71)] than CG during and outside school. No effects were found for other snacks. A CS intervention, co-created by adolescents, improved snacking in and out of school, though promoting healthy snacking remains challenging and should be a focus for future efforts. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05002049 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05002049?cond=NCT05002049&rank=1); Date of registration: July 15, 2021.

BMC Public Health
University of Exeter (GB), Mediterranean University (ME), Erasmus MC (NL), Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR), Harokopio University of Athens (GR), Departament de Salut (ES), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.