The Impact of Verbal Instruction on Countermovement Jump Testing in Division I Volleyball Athletes

Young, TL, Haynes, HK, Klubertanz, MR, Patton, MG, Mercer, ZJ, Bruni, KM, Graybeal, AJ, and Donahue, PT. The impact of verbal instruction on countermovement jump testing in Division I volleyball athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The countermovement jump (CMJ) is often used to monitor athletes' performance through the interpretation of metrics derived through force plate data collection, and recent advances in technology now allow technicians of all experience levels to easily collect data. This may introduce procedural variation, such as verbal instruction. In addition, athletes competing in sports that place importance on vertical jumping may possess ingrained movement patterns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if verbal instruction may disrupt an athlete's natural jump strategy, thus clouding interpretation of CMJ profiles. This study uses repeated-measures design with significance set at 0.05 to evaluate differences in jump variables under 3 different instructional conditions. Twelve female DI volleyball athletes performed 9 total jumps on a force platform, 3 under each condition. The instructions include: "jump as high as possible" (CMJ-H), "jump as fast as possible" (CMJ-F), and "jump to the best of your ability" (CMJ-N). No differences in jump height, braking impulse, and propulsive impulse were observed across conditions (p > 0.05). However, force variables and reactive strength index modified were significantly higher, and temporal variables were significantly lower under CMJ-F compared with CMJ-H and CMJ-N (p < 0.05). In addition, countermovement depth was significantly shallower under CMJ-F. Conversely, no significant differences were observed for any variables between CMJ-H and CMJ-N (p > 0.05). The CMJ-F condition elicits an increase in force production, whereas CMJ-H and CMJ-N elicit an elongation of time. This study indicates the need for procedural consistency regarding the instruction used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005394
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Verbal Instruction on Countermovement Jump Testing in Division I Volleyball Athletes

Paul T. Donahue, Austin J. Graybeal, Tristan Young, Madeline R. Klubertanz et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

The Impact of Verbal Instruction on Countermovement Jump Testing in Division I Volleyball Athletes

Paul T. Donahue, Austin J. Graybeal, Tristan Young, Madeline R. Klubertanz, Minali G. Patton, Zackery J. Mercer, Hunter K. Haynes, Kesaia M. Bruni
article en

Abstract

Young, TL, Haynes, HK, Klubertanz, MR, Patton, MG, Mercer, ZJ, Bruni, KM, Graybeal, AJ, and Donahue, PT. The impact of verbal instruction on countermovement jump testing in Division I volleyball athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The countermovement jump (CMJ) is often used to monitor athletes' performance through the interpretation of metrics derived through force plate data collection, and recent advances in technology now allow technicians of all experience levels to easily collect data. This may introduce procedural variation, such as verbal instruction. In addition, athletes competing in sports that place importance on vertical jumping may possess ingrained movement patterns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if verbal instruction may disrupt an athlete's natural jump strategy, thus clouding interpretation of CMJ profiles. This study uses repeated-measures design with significance set at 0.05 to evaluate differences in jump variables under 3 different instructional conditions. Twelve female DI volleyball athletes performed 9 total jumps on a force platform, 3 under each condition. The instructions include: "jump as high as possible" (CMJ-H), "jump as fast as possible" (CMJ-F), and "jump to the best of your ability" (CMJ-N). No differences in jump height, braking impulse, and propulsive impulse were observed across conditions (p > 0.05). However, force variables and reactive strength index modified were significantly higher, and temporal variables were significantly lower under CMJ-F compared with CMJ-H and CMJ-N (p < 0.05). In addition, countermovement depth was significantly shallower under CMJ-F. Conversely, no significant differences were observed for any variables between CMJ-H and CMJ-N (p > 0.05). The CMJ-F condition elicits an increase in force production, whereas CMJ-H and CMJ-N elicit an elongation of time. This study indicates the need for procedural consistency regarding the instruction used.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Texas Christian University (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Southern Mississippi (US), Auburn University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.